Dale: after some discussions in Pharo mailing list, the community wants to use the Lukas repository for OB instead of wiresong.

I don't know the impact it makes to you, and I don't know the best way to manage this kind of situations.

Right now, I create a new version and baselind to ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser� that maps to Lukas repo and I change a little the dependencies, and, of course, the versions.

Any thougths about this?

Cheers

Mariano

On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs@gemstone.com> wrote:
just fine..thanks
----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:

| On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Dale Henrichs
| <dale.henrichs@gemstone.com>wrote:
|
| >
| > ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
| >
| > | So far, I created: �ConfigurationOfNewInspector,
| > | ConfigurationOfOCompletion,
| > | ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser, ConfigurationOfPharoMorphicExtras,
| > | ConfigurationOfPharoSound, ConfigurationOfRefactoringBrowser,
| > | ConfigurationOfShout , and......ConfigurationOfPharo!!!
| >
| > Mariano,
| >
| > I'm working on a ConfigurationOfOmneBrowser that works on both
| Squeak and
| > Pharo (and ultimately GemStone ...).
| >
| > Would you prefer that I start a new baseline/version or just
| overwrite 1.0?
| >
| >
| Hi Dale. Good we are working in OB. This weekend / next-week � �I want
| to
| create a PharoDev image with OB so maybe I would rather if you can
| create a
| new baseline (taking 1.0 as a base) and if you want, later we can
| "merge" if
| necessary.
|
| What do you think ? �Is this ok for you ?
|
|
| > I lean towards overwriting, especially this early in the process,
| but I
| > want your opinion.
| >
| > Dale
| >
| > _______________________________________________
| > Pharo-project mailing list
| > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
| > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
| >