Am 20.02.2012 21:30, schrieb Nicolas Cellier:
Le 20 février 2012 21:18, Frank Shearar<frank.shearar@gmail.com> a écrit :
On 20 February 2012 19:41, Guido Stepken<gstepken@googlemail.com> wrote:
Am 20.02.2012 10:22, schrieb Edgar J. De Cleene:
Yesterday in a response to Craig I said have a Cuis with a wiki on top and this .image is 5 mb and run on a âmodernâ G4 400 mhz PowerMac.
Thatâs is a beauty and the power of Cuis, thanks Juan for your reduced image of 2 mb
Looks nice.
World menu -> appearance -> set desktop color -> Error
What i - never ever - understand is, why - when Smalltalk is a reflective language and there are so mighty tools - like Moose - out there, able to search the whole codebase for possible occurrences of "message not understood"????? This is just a trivial application of the solution to the Halting Problem (left as an exercise for the reader).
Or: if you want to avoid MNU, don't use a dynamically typed language.
What, what, the right development process wouldn't solve such a trivial problem ? Guido, try to inspect yourself with all your introspection tools and development process know how, because I have the feeling that despite the many answers you got, you still face a message not understood problem ;)
Nicolas
There *is* a possibility to check, if there is some sender sending something, that a receiver cannot understand. NONSENSE! Do it, develop the development process, insure quality in the code!!! Have fun! Guido Stepken