On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre@bergel.eu>wrote:
However, I am okay to have them in a separate package.
Yes, I would really prefer this option is nobody discover that they are really needed in the core. I would like to hear other opinions, thus. BTW, you usually build your Moose images based in PharoCore or PharoDev? Cheers Mariano
Alexandre
On 19 Jan 2010, at 07:20, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80- Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc and Circule shows the same. Evaluate:
Arc example Circle example Spline example
So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? opinions?
Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :)
Cheers
Mariano
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project