On 05 Mar 2016, at 16:34, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
I was thinking as this name : Abacus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abacus A calculating tool !
I like that one (BTW, thanks for doing this project, Serge & Co, these higher level, domain specific projects are really very important)
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-03-04 19:51 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com>:
I personally never liked the name âSciSmalltalkâ. âSciPharoâ is much better in my opinion PhaNum is also okay to me.
SciSmalltalk is ugly.
I don't like the name either. We will find a better sexy name !
Just a random line of thought... PhaNum --> NumPha --> numcha --> numchi --> numqi "An energy around numbers"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi
cheers -ben
Currently, there is no package named SciSmalltalk. SciSmalltalk is just: - an aggregate of packages (a metacello configuration) - a repository (github + Smalltalkhub)
SciSmalltalk is a bit more than just a few packages ... We have tests, we have a CI job, we have a book.
-- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
-- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/