The 22.02.2012 00:08 "Stephen Taylor" <stephen.taylor@bom.gov.au> wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:33 -0600, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
If he actually provides something usefully such as a bug report with reproducible actions, or a patch, an appropriate approved actionable suggestion. Then we can treat those emails with the respect due such emails.
That's what's so frustrating - *some* of Guido's complaints make sense. And Pharo would be helped by helped by remorseless but constructive criticism. But that's not what Guido's supplying.
Jimmie
Steve
Strip of or "Separate FORM from CONTENT". Like MVP or MVC. Some people intuitively understand my input, have a *unemotional reception* of *information*, others are just Professors, with emphasize on empathicaly teaching and educating (older) kids for the rest of their life! :-) I know exactly, what i am doing and why, from the psychological point of view. I PERSONALY have nothing against anybody and its participation in the project. But i *know* from my experience as project leader, that *all* projects, where project leaders tried to suppress criticism or "negative thinking" finally failed. That's why i "play" the "enfant terrible" (think why this is a magic expression) here. Tnx 4 understanding, Guido Stepken