The 22.02.2012 00:08 "Stephen Taylor" <stephen.taylor@bom.gov.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:33 -0600, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
>
> > If he actually provides
> > something usefully such as a bug report with reproducible actions, or
> > a patch, an appropriate approved actionable suggestion. Then we can
> > treat ��those emails with the respect due such emails.
>
> That's what's so frustrating - *some* of Guido's complaints make sense.
> And Pharo would be helped by helped by remorseless but constructive
> criticism. But that's not what Guido's supplying.
>
> > Jimmie
>
>
>
> �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� Steve

Strip of or "Separate FORM from CONTENT". Like MVP or MVC. Some people intuitively understand my input, have a *unemotional reception* of *information*, others are just Professors, with emphasize on empathicaly teaching and educating (older) kids for the rest of their life! :-)

I know exactly, what i am doing and why, from the psychological point of view. I PERSONALY have nothing against anybody and its participation in the project.

But i *know* from my experience as project leader, that *all* projects, where project leaders tried to suppress criticism or "negative thinking" finally failed.

That's why i "play" the "enfant terrible" (think why this is a magic expression) here.

Tnx 4 understanding,

Guido Stepken