Haha, but sometimes you can't decide :P On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2@btinternet.com>wrote:
** Having looked at the support for WSDL interpretation in Pharo/Squeak recently we decided to go RESTful instead ;-) For us we prefer to be more dynamic, not to say that a general WSDL-based interface could not be done without creating new classes though.
Regards, Gary
----- Original Message ----- *From:* Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> *To:* Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr *Sent:* Wednesday, September 28, 2011 6:23 PM *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-project] Webservices (any update)
I don't think so... (But I didn't use it in a real environment yet, so I can be wrong :) ). I've only saved it in squeaksource, made it load into pharo (1.1 las year) and built a metacello configuration because it uses Kom.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther < holger@freyther.de> wrote:
On 09/27/2011 02:01 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
A year ago I introduced SoapOpera into squeaksource... But he needs someone to take care of it :) since I've never had time to do it.
Hi,
is there code to use/adopt a WSDL file?
holger