Haha, but sometimes you can't decide :P

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2@btinternet.com> wrote:
Having looked at the support for WSDL interpretation �in Pharo/Squeak recently we decided to go RESTful instead ;-)
For us we prefer to be more dynamic, not to say that a general�WSDL-based interface could not be done without creating new classes though.
�
Regards, Gary
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Webservices (any update)

I don't think so...� (But I didn't use it in a real environment yet, so I can be wrong :) ).� I've only saved it in squeaksource, made it load into pharo (1.1 las year) and� built a metacello configuration because it uses Kom.

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger@freyther.de> wrote:
On 09/27/2011 02:01 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
> A year ago I introduced SoapOpera into squeaksource... �But he needs someone
> to take care of it :) since I've never had time to do it.
>
> http://www.squeaksource.com/SoapOpera

Hi,

is there code to use/adopt a WSDL file?

holger