On 2013-02-08, at 23:30, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:00 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo@gmail.com> wrote:
(regarding Mantis)
2013/2/8 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>:
we used it for squeak and I never liked it.
It is ugly as it gets, I don't like its appearance either. I won't argue on that :)
But it is reliable, flexible and full of features.
But if you look at it.. they published statistics for Squeak, and it was something like 10 people used it in 12 months on 50 bugs (or something like that).
We closed >1500 in not even 10 months⦠the software used as a issue tracker has to be some kind of influence on that.
That's not a valid comparison. In Squeak trunk bugs are getting fixed at a much higher rate than that but it isn't tracked on the issue tracker, because.......
we mostly don't use an issue tracker.
sigh! which is impressive in 2013...