On 13 January 2011 11:29, Tudor Girba <tudor.girba@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On 13 Jan 2011, at 11:12, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 13 January 2011 10:41, Tudor Girba <tudor.girba@gmail.com> wrote:
Of course, it is MIT and you can do what you want with it. I simply answered the question from Stef, and I meant that I won't include it in the code from the Glamour repository. If you do want to modify it in the mentioned direction, I would kindly ask you to use a different name to avoid confusion and conflicts - this theme is used by the Moose distribution.
Can you clarify: a) you don't want to modify Glamorous theme (GLMUITheme) by taking all methods from GLMUITheme2.
Yes
b) you don't want to add a GLMUITheme2 , which is a subclass of GLMUITheme because these changes could live in GLMUITheme2, which is perfectly fine, while keeping an original GLMUITheme not changed. And we can call GLMUITheme2 a  'Glamorous orange' :)
Yes :). It's true that technically it would work, but from an intention point of view it does not fit. Also, in general, except on very few occasions, I won't support adding anything that has a number at the end to distinguish the name :).
Not a big deal.. We can rename it to GLMOrangeUITheme and make available to Pharo people? Still no? :)
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal."
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.