GenericYear does this. The generic Year will take '2/29/2000' asDate + 1 year "=> 28 February 2001" In other words, we want it at the same time next year; more importantly the same month and close to what we have now. Also: '3/1/2001' asDate - 1 year "=> 1 March 2000" Still, same month - we want to be at the beginning of the month the previous year. Basically, my idea (and, more importantly, what I expect - hence my code) is that I want to pretend that we do have a field-based representation and make it work that way. except better (since there is no 2/29/2001).
Ej, which one of the followings is OK? '2011-03-01' asDate + 1 year "=> 2012-02-29"
Well, I have a bug here. That needs to be fixed. -cbc On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Esteban A. Maringolo wrote
Ej, which one of the followings is OK? '2012-02-29' asDate + 1 year "=> 2013-02-28" '2011-03-01' asDate + 1 year "=> 2012-02-29"
One solution (just ignore the source ha ha) -
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.datetime.addyears%28v=vs.110%...
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Duration-year-tp4791727p4793656.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.