GenericYear does this.�� The generic Year will take��
�� ��'2/29/2000' asDate + 1 year "=>��28 February 2001"
In other words, we want it at the same time next year; more importantly the same month and close to what we have now.
Also:
�� ��'3/1/2001' asDate - 1 year "=>��1 March 2000"
Still, same month - we want to be at the beginning of the month the previous year.
Basically, my idea (and, more importantly, what I expect - hence my code) is that I want to pretend that we do have a field-based representation and make it work that way. ��except better (since there is no 2/29/2001).
> Ej, which one of the followings is OK?
> '2011-03-01' asDate + 1 year "=> 2012-02-29"
Well, I have a bug here.�� That needs to be fixed.
-cbc