Any chance of a Windows VM that deals with the BitBlt problems with respect to antialiased StrikeFonts? Regards, Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stéphane Ducasse" <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> To: <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:46 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] testing the linux vm of pharo-project
I would not put the stexupery as first vm because the squeak one should be more tested.
Stef
On Jan 19, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Ok...so: pharo exupery vm as FTPlugin compiled and 3.11. doesn't. And both are closure-enable.
Does someone have a compiled squeak-unix-vm with FTPlugin ? because otherwise, I think I would rather to put again Exupery as the default one.
Opinions?
2010/1/19 George Herolyants <george.herolyants@gmail.com> So, here are the results (see attachments). On the background of each pharo screenshot you can see the version number of the vm, and command line I used to run pharo image with this vm. As you can see results are far better for the pharo-exupery-linux-vm (which means 0.15.2f), because it has FTPlugin compiled, and squeak-unix-vm (which means 3.11.3-2135) hasn't.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project