On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
In order to have something coherent, every sub-librairies of Sci-Smalltalk should be packaged as 'Math-XXX'. Right now, i have Math-Random and Math-Random-Tests.
Just curious, why Sci in the name, but Math as the package? Â I could see that growing over time, but to start with the discrepancy seems odd. Â Not a problem, just odd.
I think that "Math-XXX" is more easy to understand for than "SciSmalltalk-XXX" (for someone who don't know what is SciSmalltalk). Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/