[Pharo-project] SciSmalltalk first commit
Dear all, i made the first commit for the SciSmalltalk project. The code is available here: https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk As a test, i commit the random number generator available here: http://www.squeaksource.com/Random.html I put here a list of potential existing code that could be integrated in SciSmalltalk: https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk/wiki/Existing-Math-packages-... I will asked the authors if they agree to package their code in SciSmalltalk. In order to have something coherent, every sub-librairies of Sci-Smalltalk should be packaged as 'Math-XXX'. Right now, i have Math-Random and Math-Random-Tests. SciSmalltalk will contain only code released under MIT licence. Any comments ? Best regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
On Apr 2, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
Dear all,
i made the first commit for the SciSmalltalk project. The code is available here: https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk
just a question why not ss3?
As a test, i commit the random number generator available here: http://www.squeaksource.com/Random.html
I put here a list of potential existing code that could be integrated in SciSmalltalk: https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk/wiki/Existing-Math-packages-... I will asked the authors if they agree to package their code in SciSmalltalk.
In order to have something coherent, every sub-librairies of Sci-Smalltalk should be packaged as 'Math-XXX'. Right now, i have Math-Random and Math-Random-Tests.
SciSmalltalk will contain only code released under MIT licence.
Any comments ? Best regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Apr 2, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
Dear all,
i made the first commit for the SciSmalltalk project. The code is available here: https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk
just a question why not ss3?
Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-) I will push a copy on ss3 also. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
Dear all,
i made the first commit for the SciSmalltalk project. The code is available here: https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk
just a question why not ss3?
Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-) I will push a copy on ss3 also.
My point is that how can I work and merge using monticello if this is only pubslihed on git. I just tend to avoid to lose time with on-going solutions. So if you really people to help use the tools they use. Stef
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Dear all,
i made the first commit for the SciSmalltalk project. The code is available here: https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk
just a question why not ss3?
Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-) I will push a copy on ss3 also.
My point is that how can I work and merge using monticello if this is only pubslihed on git. I just tend to avoid to lose time with on-going solutions. So if you really people to help use the tools they use.
This work like a usual mc repository. Ok no worry, i will put the package also on ss3 ;-) Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
+1 2012/4/3 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>
Dear all,
i made the first commit for the SciSmalltalk project. The code is available here: https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk
just a question why not ss3?
Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-) I will push a copy on ss3 also.
My point is that how can I work and merge using monticello if this is only pubslihed on git. I just tend to avoid to lose time with on-going solutions. So if you really people to help use the tools they use.
Stef
-- Philippe Back "Helping you hit the top 3 outcomes you really want to achieve" Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027 Mail: phil@highoctane.be| Web: http://philippeback.eu | Blog: http://philippeback.be High Octane SPRL rue cour Boisacq 101 1301 Bierges
Serge, On 03 Apr 2012, at 03:24, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-)
Yes, if MCFileTreeRepository lives up to its promise, and apparently it does, because you are using it, that is really great. Does it really work transparently ? Again, one more thing to check out, time permitting. Sven
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be> wrote:
Serge,
On 03 Apr 2012, at 03:24, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-)
Yes, if MCFileTreeRepository lives up to its promise, and apparently it does, because you are using it, that is really great. Does it really work transparently ?
This is not transparent because you need to commit with git but this quite easy to do that. What is only missing for me is the way to generate .mcz file automatically from a MCFileTreeRepository. I love that you can commit other files than Smalltalk code on your repo (pictures, README file ...). Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
On Apr 3, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be> wrote:
Serge,
On 03 Apr 2012, at 03:24, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-)
Yes, if MCFileTreeRepository lives up to its promise, and apparently it does, because you are using it, that is really great. Does it really work transparently ?
This is not transparent because you need to commit with git but this quite easy to do that. What is only missing for me is the way to generate .mcz file automatically from a MCFileTreeRepository.
I love that you can commit other files than Smalltalk code on your repo (pictures, README file â¦).
sure me too. I support the integration but I do not want alpha version for my alpha work :)
Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Apr 3, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be> wrote:
Serge,
On 03 Apr 2012, at 03:24, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-)
Yes, if MCFileTreeRepository lives up to its promise, and apparently it does, because you are using it, that is really great. Does it really work transparently ?
This is not transparent because you need to commit with git but this quite easy to do that. What is only missing for me is the way to generate .mcz file automatically from a MCFileTreeRepository.
I love that you can commit other files than Smalltalk code on your repo (pictures, README file â¦).
sure me too. I support the integration but I do not want alpha version for my alpha work :)
Yes sure. There is a now a ss3 repository also here: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/SciSmalltalk.html Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
In order to have something coherent, every sub-librairies of Sci-Smalltalk should be packaged as 'Math-XXX'. Right now, i have Math-Random and Math-Random-Tests.
Just curious, why Sci in the name, but Math as the package? I could see that growing over time, but to start with the discrepancy seems odd. Not a problem, just odd. -Chris
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
In order to have something coherent, every sub-librairies of Sci-Smalltalk should be packaged as 'Math-XXX'. Right now, i have Math-Random and Math-Random-Tests.
Just curious, why Sci in the name, but Math as the package? Â I could see that growing over time, but to start with the discrepancy seems odd. Â Not a problem, just odd.
I think that "Math-XXX" is more easy to understand for than "SciSmalltalk-XXX" (for someone who don't know what is SciSmalltalk). Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
participants (5)
-
Chris Cunningham -
phil＠highoctane.be -
Serge Stinckwich -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Sven Van Caekenberghe