On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/1/4 Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab@anest.ufl.edu>:
We certainly don't need the web images, but I would like to see them stay to help with testing. If we are building them with unstable versions of Seaside, that is a problem with the process (loading the wrong stuff) not the concept/service (providing a Seaside-ready version of Pharo for testing). We just finished designing a beta program, at least three of volunteers indicated a preference for the web image.
Bill
1. *We* (who sitting here for a while), certainly don't need web images. 2. Newcomers, or entry-level youngsters, definitely will prefer a ready-to-use solutions, which easy to install, run & play with.
So, +1 for keeping web images.
But Igor, there is nothing easier than a double click. And seaside one click is just a double click no matter in what OS you are. They are MUCH more easier for new commers than a PharoWeb image where they have to download the VM, the sources and the image.
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project