On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Igor Stasenko
<siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/1/4 Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab@anest.ufl.edu>:
> We certainly don't need the web images, but I would like to see them stay to
> help with testing.� If we are building them with unstable versions of
> Seaside, that is a problem with the process (loading the wrong stuff) not
> the concept/service (providing a Seaside-ready version of Pharo for
> testing).�� We just finished designing a beta program, at least three of
> volunteers indicated a preference for the web image.
>
> Bill
1. *We* (who sitting here for a while), certainly don't need web images.
2. Newcomers, or entry-level youngsters, definitely will prefer a
ready-to-use solutions, which easy to install, run & play with.
So, +1 for keeping web images.
But Igor, there is nothing easier than a double click. And seaside one click is just a double click no matter in what OS you are.
They are MUCH more easier for new commers than a PharoWeb image where they have to download the VM, the sources and the image.
�
--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.