I don't know exactly why... but I tend to agree with Igor with this one... It's not that I like copy/paste, or that the <..> pragma is sexy but it seems to me that there will be too much going on under the hood but ... well I hope at least that the user will see the pragma to understand that something funky is going on -- Ciprian On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com>wrote:
On 2012-11-26, at 12:45, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 November 2012 16:27, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
it's funny to see, but even when you gave your demo even you couldn't
type
the pragma definition yourself, so how do you except this to affect newcomers?
no need to convince me. of course i can type it.. but most of the time you copy/paster it from method to method.
of course you can copy paste it, but if you can avoid it at all, why would you even bother copy pasting?
besides your opal solution will be ready in > 2 months. Actually we simply have to add a proper UI handler for the exception you throw when there is no primitive installed. You let the programmer decide what to do => 100% safe
it is your call. do it if you want it so badly :)
yup I put it on ym todo
-- Dr. Ciprian TEODOROV Ingénieur Développement CAO tél : 06 08 54 73 48 mail : ciprian.teodorov@gmail.com www.teodorov.ro