I don't know exactly why... but I tend to agree with Igor with this one...
It's not that I like copy/paste, or that the <..> pragma is sexy but it seems to me that there will be too much going on under the hood

but ... well I hope at least that the user will see the pragma to understand that something funky is going on

--
Ciprian�

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:

On 2012-11-26, at 12:45, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 26 November 2012 16:27, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> it's funny to see, but even when you gave your demo even you couldn't type
>>>> the pragma definition yourself, so how do you except this to affect newcomers?
>>>
>>> no need to convince me.
>>> of course i can type it.. but most of the time you copy/paster it from
>>> method to method.
>>
>> of course you can copy paste it, but if you can avoid it at all, why would
>> you even bother copy pasting?
>>
>> besides your opal solution will be ready in > 2 months.
>> Actually we simply have to add a proper UI handler for the exception you
>> throw when there is no primitive installed. You let the programmer decide
>> what to do => 100% safe
>
> it is your call. do it if you want it so badly :)

yup I put it on ym todo



--
Dr. Ciprian TEODOROV
Ing
nieur�D�veloppement�CAO

t�l : 06 08 54 73 48

mail :�ciprian.teodorov@gmail.com
www.teodorov.ro