On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:20 AM Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
An uncommon situation but it exposes something that would be nice to correct anyhow...
If interCyclePause is commented out like...
WorldState >>doOneCycleFor: aWorld "self interCyclePause: MinCycleLapse." self doOneCycleNowFor: aWorld.
in Process Browser there is a build-up of unnamed priority 31 processes. I haven't been able to track down where these arise from to work out what their name should be.
Anyone who contributed code which creates forks a new process, could you check if this is the source and provide a name?
cheers -ben
P.S. I wonder if the default name of forked processes should be something like "thisContext sender receiver"
Maybe. I don't like in general how people overuse processes. I've seen lately tons of deadlocks and non-dying processes... -- Guille Polito Research Engineer Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille CRIStAL - UMR 9189 French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr <http://www.cnrs.fr>* *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13