An uncommon situation but it exposes something that would be nice to correct anyhow...

If interCyclePause is commented out like...��

�� �� WorldState��>>doOneCycleFor: aWorld

"self interCyclePause: MinCycleLapse."

self doOneCycleNowFor: aWorld.

in Process Browser there is a build-up of unnamed priority 31 processes.����

I haven't been able to track down where these arise from��

to work out what their name should be.�� ����

Anyone who contributed code which creates forks a new process,��

could you check if this is the source and provide a name?

cheers -ben

P.S. I wonder if the default name of forked processes should be something like "thisContext sender receiver"