so then I want the issue tracker entries back on this mailing list. otherwise it is inconsistent... On 2013-01-29, at 10:51, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
well.. I more or less agree with Torsten (even if I already subscribed): component parts of Pharo should be kept together, otherwise... why not to create a group for mophic, for zinc, for filesystem, etc.? jutst to have a nice header? do you know you have some rules that you can apply to auto-label mails? :)
On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
subscribe and you're done,
the thing you get for Free is a decent title in the message in your mail client. For me that saves a couple of second on each mail to check about what it is.
On 2013-01-29, at 08:40, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image and the discussion should be here as well.
valid point. but then again, we will anyway allways announce changes made by NativeBoost automatically via the update mails.
Besides, the issue tracker is also no longer in the mailinglist, which is essentially the heart of development? How do you argue in favor of that?
Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able to follow or find...
invalid point: well then the INRIA mailing lists are the worst place since they don't have a proper index either. the only thing that get's indexed is the mapped forum on http://forum.world.st/
Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
nah, my personal opinion outweighs, besides you're always free to not use it...