[Pharo-project] nativeboost google groups
subscribe and you're done, the thing you get for Free is a decent title in the message in your mail client. For me that saves a couple of second on each mail to check about what it is. On 2013-01-29, at 08:40, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image and the discussion should be here as well.
valid point. but then again, we will anyway allways announce changes made by NativeBoost automatically via the update mails. Besides, the issue tracker is also no longer in the mailinglist, which is essentially the heart of development? How do you argue in favor of that?
Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able to follow or find...
invalid point: well then the INRIA mailing lists are the worst place since they don't have a proper index either. the only thing that get's indexed is the mapped forum on http://forum.world.st/
Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
nah, my personal opinion outweighs, besides you're always free to not use it...
well.. I more or less agree with Torsten (even if I already subscribed): component parts of Pharo should be kept together, otherwise... why not to create a group for mophic, for zinc, for filesystem, etc.? jutst to have a nice header? do you know you have some rules that you can apply to auto-label mails? :) On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
subscribe and you're done,
the thing you get for Free is a decent title in the message in your mail client. For me that saves a couple of second on each mail to check about what it is.
On 2013-01-29, at 08:40, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image and the discussion should be here as well.
valid point. but then again, we will anyway allways announce changes made by NativeBoost automatically via the update mails.
Besides, the issue tracker is also no longer in the mailinglist, which is essentially the heart of development? How do you argue in favor of that?
Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able to follow or find...
invalid point: well then the INRIA mailing lists are the worst place since they don't have a proper index either. the only thing that get's indexed is the mapped forum on http://forum.world.st/
Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
nah, my personal opinion outweighs, besides you're always free to not use it...
so then I want the issue tracker entries back on this mailing list. otherwise it is inconsistent... On 2013-01-29, at 10:51, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
well.. I more or less agree with Torsten (even if I already subscribed): component parts of Pharo should be kept together, otherwise... why not to create a group for mophic, for zinc, for filesystem, etc.? jutst to have a nice header? do you know you have some rules that you can apply to auto-label mails? :)
On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
subscribe and you're done,
the thing you get for Free is a decent title in the message in your mail client. For me that saves a couple of second on each mail to check about what it is.
On 2013-01-29, at 08:40, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image and the discussion should be here as well.
valid point. but then again, we will anyway allways announce changes made by NativeBoost automatically via the update mails.
Besides, the issue tracker is also no longer in the mailinglist, which is essentially the heart of development? How do you argue in favor of that?
Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able to follow or find...
invalid point: well then the INRIA mailing lists are the worst place since they don't have a proper index either. the only thing that get's indexed is the mapped forum on http://forum.world.st/
Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
nah, my personal opinion outweighs, besides you're always free to not use it...
IMHO, even the pharo-users and pharo-dev mailing lists should be together. We're a too small community to have fragmentation when we can avoid it. Pharo should be documented/self-documented and stable enough to not require newcomers to subscribe to a mailing list to get answers to their normal problems. Mailing lists are old-fashioned for getting answers of "common" problems, usage, etc, for everything else, maybe StackOverflow is a good tool to use, and also a display for Pharo community. Less is more. :) Esteban A. Maringolo 2013/1/29 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:
well.. I more or less agree with Torsten (even if I already subscribed): component parts of Pharo should be kept together, otherwise... why not to create a group for mophic, for zinc, for filesystem, etc.? jutst to have a nice header? do you know you have some rules that you can apply to auto-label mails? :)
On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
subscribe and you're done,
the thing you get for Free is a decent title in the message in your mail client. For me that saves a couple of second on each mail to check about what it is.
On 2013-01-29, at 08:40, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image and the discussion should be here as well.
valid point. but then again, we will anyway allways announce changes made by NativeBoost automatically via the update mails.
Besides, the issue tracker is also no longer in the mailinglist, which is essentially the heart of development? How do you argue in favor of that?
Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able to follow or find...
invalid point: well then the INRIA mailing lists are the worst place since they don't have a proper index either. the only thing that get's indexed is the mapped forum on http://forum.world.st/
Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
nah, my personal opinion outweighs, besides you're always free to not use it...
I agree. Especially for core elements. I do not fully understand nativeboost but I like to read the messages and question because I learn the domain like NBHandleâ¦. Stef
I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image and the discussion should be here as well.
Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able to follow or find...
Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
Bye T.
Hi guys, I hate to revive this discussion, but I am confused... What has been decided about NB ? Are we supposed to continue using pharo list? Or the Google group started by Camillo? Cheers I agree. Especially for core elements. I do not fully understand nativeboost but I like to read the messages and question because I learn the domain like NBHandleâ¦. Stef
I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image and the discussion should be here as well.
Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able to follow or find...
Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
Bye T.
I guess the primary code contributors should decide.. On Friday, February 1, 2013, Ciprian Teodorov wrote:
Hi guys,
I hate to revive this discussion, but I am confused... What has been decided about NB ? Are we supposed to continue using pharo list? Or the Google group started by Camillo?
Cheers I agree. Especially for core elements. I do not fully understand nativeboost but I like to read the messages and question because I learn the domain like NBHandleâ¦.
Stef
I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image and the discussion should be here as well.
Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able to follow or find...
Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
Bye T.
On 1 February 2013 13:29, S Krish <krishnamachari.sudhakar@gmail.com> wrote:
I guess the primary code contributors should decide..
i don't have strong opinion about this. For me it is not important where discussion takes place, but its participants.
On Friday, February 1, 2013, Ciprian Teodorov wrote:
Hi guys,
I hate to revive this discussion, but I am confused... What has been decided about NB ? Are we supposed to continue using pharo list? Or the Google group started by Camillo?
Cheers
I agree. Especially for core elements. I do not fully understand nativeboost but I like to read the messages and question because I learn the domain like NBHandleâ¦.
Stef
I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image and the discussion should be here as well.
Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able to follow or find...
Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
Bye T.
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
participants (8)
-
Camillo Bruni -
Ciprian Teodorov -
Esteban A. Maringolo -
Esteban Lorenzano -
Igor Stasenko -
S Krish -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Torsten Bergmann