On 31 January 2012 17:01, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab@anest.ufl.edu> wrote:
Sig,
I'm tired of reading that I'm asking people to do work FOR ME. Â I am "asking" for things that will allow me to do things for YOU. Want the attached in useful form? Â Maybe you don't - numerical analysis is a "home" to me. Â ***I**** have what I need - YOU don't.
But you never said something like that before, i.e. "when you will have *that*, i can release/improve *this* so everyone can benefit". Unless you say what are you working on and what/why you need something , how else we can know?
I'm done with this bickering over semantics and being told how I'm leaning on others. Â When callbacks are supported, I will use them to turn the attached (and more, plus >100 stucture defs) into something that YOU can use and make it available for YOU. Â Until then, I don't have the time to waste on a half-baked solution with C callbacks that will be discarded once Spock arrives.
BTW, some Gnuplot and PLplot bindings are in a similar situation. Â Yours *when* the infrastructure is in place. Â Last I'm going to say on this. Â I will NOT change things twice - too damn much work.
do you have some tool for generating these bindings? because if not, then indeed its too much work to do manually. -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.