On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:58:41 +0100, Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel@gmail.com> wrote:
"DataSource" is responsible for providing visual elements that represent items in a data set.
who said that. I could say exactly: DataSource is responsible to cut data so that they are delivered by row or columns.
I don't see how word "Store" fits here, because DataSource does not store anything.
Store in the sense of serving something.
DataSource is also not the best name since it is not a data source itself.
Clearly not
An object that is now called DataSource, basically just knows a single function that from mathematical point of view can be defined as >follows: f: Object -> Morph . You see, it is a mapping, not a souse or store.
Cheers, Alex
On 29 November 2016 at 09:44, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-11-29 9:35 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:
yes, something like TableCellSource or TableCellProvider is more intention revealing.
No, because is not *just* a cell provider.TableDataSource, TableStore, TableProvider, yes.
I kind of like âTableStoreâ.
And if we have TableMorph then this guy should be TableMorphStore IMO.
-- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/