Have you given any thought to how you want the publicly consumable version of Pharo named? As I understand it, the PharoCore is for the Pharo development teams consumption; there is another version that is intended for the end user. Is this correct? If so, a simpler naming scheme might be nice there. Also, is there a desire to create a new sources file for the 1.0 release? Or at least changing the name from Squeak39.sources to something like Pharo1.sources? Not critical, but could reduce some confusion. I'd ask the same thing about the VM name, but I suspect that wouldn't be the best choice - leaving it with the Squeak name on it guides the user to the conclusion that they might be able to grab any SqueakVM that have a chance that it will work with Pharo. And they'd probably be right, if it is a new enough VM. This was all triggered by installing the Beta release last night and noticing the various names floating around, and then seeing this discussion. -Chris