Have you given any thought to how you want the publicly consumable version of Pharo named?� As I understand it, the PharoCore is for the Pharo development teams consumption; there is another version that is intended for the end user.� Is this correct?� If so, a simpler naming scheme might be nice there.

�

Also, is there a desire to create a new sources file for the 1.0 release?� Or at least changing the name from Squeak39.sources to something like Pharo1.sources?� Not critical, but could reduce some confusion.

�

I'd ask the same thing about the VM name, but I suspect that wouldn't be the best choice - leaving it with the Squeak name on it guides the user to the conclusion that they might be able to grab any SqueakVM that have a chance that it will work with Pharo.� And they'd probably be right, if it is a new enough VM.

�

This was all triggered by installing the Beta release last night and noticing the various names floating around, and then seeing this discussion.

�

-Chris