sure no problem I was just explaining :) On Apr 23, 2009, at 11:44 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
for sure don't get me wrong ;-) i'm all for change and we're making great progress. it was just in comment to alpha->beta style discussion. I'm looking forward to us discussing release candidates. that will be cool indeed.
mike
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
I agree. But we took the decision to harvest the fix of events because they could rot dramatically. Then removing bad code is also important for the relicensing. The less etoy bookmoprh the less relicensing we have.
I have been running the sunits recently for each update or published build. It would be great if more people could do this so that we can seriously get the error list down. Also we should try not to push out updates if they increase the error number. To make comparison easier I was going to publish the baseline results on the wiki to make it easy to see progress. I got stuck when recently the tests did not complete :-) but I think this is a good example of why we should focus in this area. Thanks mike
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project