On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
I think, if you really want to compare, you should look closer than what the two slogans say. Just one example: bugs.squeak.org currently has 2315 open issues...
Does that number apply for the current squeak developement? Or did you just look at the number on the "view_all_bug_page" with no filter applied (which counts all the issues of other forks, external packages, non-developement related tasks, old branches, etc.) and thought: hey here's a big number, this will show how professional we are compared to squeak? Levente
Cheers, Adrian
On Jan 27, 2010, at 17:39 , Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Adrian" == Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> writes:
Adrian> "Pharo provides a clean and innovative MIT-licensed Smalltalk Adrian> environment with a stable and small core system, excellent developer Adrian> tools, and maintained releases."
Which, at this point, would not distinguish it from what Squeak core will be within another few weeks.
Do you have any verbage that would allow newcomers to choose Squeak vs Pharo?
Or are the goals and purpose finally merging again?
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project