Why omnibrowser is bad? Is omnibrowser idea for building browsers failed? 2011/4/6 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>
It is not. The idea is to have a default browser and set of tools that we can use in bare core image and that are not based on toolBuilder or stringHolder. After if Glamour produces a nice IDE then we can load it and use it. In addition benjamin is fixing a lot of problems in default widgets like multiple selection, hilighting....
Stef
Hi, how does it relate to glamourost?
thanks, Mike
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi Guys,
Maybe I missed part of the discussion, but what is Nautilus?
A new browser :) Supporting - groups - package - declarative menus - environment selection - scoped actions - soon refactoring
but right now a bit too slow because of the HUGGGGGGEEEEEE trees build
by TreeMorphTreeMorph
Squeaksource simply says "A new browser"
Cheers, Alexandre