Why omnibrowser is bad?
Is omnibrowser idea for building browsers failed?
It is not.
The idea is to have a default browser and set of tools that we can use
in bare core image and that are not based on toolBuilder or stringHolder.
After if Glamour produces a nice IDE then we can load it and use it.
In addition benjamin is fixing a lot of problems in default widgets like multiple selection,
hilighting....
Stef
> Hi, how does it relate to glamourost?
>
> thanks,
> Mike
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:57 PM, St�phane Ducasse
> <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 5, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> Maybe I missed part of the discussion, but what is Nautilus?
>>
>> A new browser :)
>> Supporting
>> � � � �- groups
>> � � � �- package
>> � � � �- declarative menus
>> � � � �- environment selection
>> � � � �- scoped actions
>> � � � �- soon refactoring
>>
>> but right now a bit too slow because of the HUGGGGGGEEEEEE trees build by TreeMorphTreeMorph
>>
>>> Squeaksource simply says "A new browser"
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>>
>