- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Playground key binding...

by stepharo

May be it was in Pharo 20. I changed the logic associated with the keybinding. I will see if I can dive into it but I would like to finish the Pharo tour chapter first Le 19/1/16 11:31, Tudor Girba a Ã©crit : > Hi, > > The current logic is not specific to the playground, it is the same in all other tools. This probably got lost before we introduced GT because I do not find the logic in Pharo 3.0 either. > > It would be interesting to salvage this logic. Could someone point me to it? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > >> On Jan 19, 2016, at 9:44 AM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> a really handy keybinding was >> >> CMD-b on class to browse a class >> such key binding was smart enough to see that when this is not a class binding but a symbol >> it was performing an implementor >> >> Why should I know when the system can do it for me? >> >> Same CMD-m is doing first a implementor if the receiver was a symbol and then >> a class browse when this is a binding. This one is still working. >> >> I would like to get the behavior **I** implemented in Pharo 30 back. >> Why we cannot keep the good things we do? >> >> Stef >> > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "When people care, great things can happen." > > > > > >

Jan. 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Playground key binding...

by stepharo

Le 19/1/16 09:58, Guillermo Polito a Ã©crit : > I agree, > > I think that "browse class or traitâ and âimplementorsâ should both be => âgo to implementationâ > And âsendersâ and âclass referencesâ should both be => âlook for referencesâ > > The only difference is that today one works for selectors and the other for classes. But we can be polymorphic in the UI also, canât we? :) Yes this is all my point. > > Afterwards, we could discuss if it is worth it to have two shortcuts for the same thing :). > >> On 19 ene 2016, at 9:44 a.m., stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> a really handy keybinding was >> >> CMD-b on class to browse a class >> such key binding was smart enough to see that when this is not a class binding but a symbol >> it was performing an implementor >> >> Why should I know when the system can do it for me? >> >> Same CMD-m is doing first a implementor if the receiver was a symbol and then >> a class browse when this is a binding. This one is still working. >> >> I would like to get the behavior **I** implemented in Pharo 30 back. >> Why we cannot keep the good things we do? >> >> Stef >> > >

Jan. 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] How do I reset Spotter?

by stepharo

Thanks Could you add a menu item? Seriously resetting a tool is part of its public end-user API. Stef Le 19/1/16 09:50, Andrei Chis a Ã©crit : > GTSpotter cleanUp. > GTSpotter dontShowPreview > > Cheers, > Andrei > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr > <mailto:stepharo@free.fr>> wrote: > > I can tell you that I would love that people doing tools produce > videos and books because > they will learn a lot about themselves and their tools. > > RIght now I do not know how to reset Spotter because I want to > explain it from the same > state that the guy will face. > > You make me lose so much time.... you cannot imagine. > I think that I will skip tools that cannot be reset from a menu. > > Stef > >

Jan. 19, 2016

how do I get the list of categories in Spotter?

by stepharo

Hi I was stupid enough to write in the book that #method is for methods. but this is for #implementors. So how do I get the list of categories in Spotter? Magic? Stef

Jan. 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Playground key binding...

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 19 Jan 2016, at 09:58, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I think that "browse class or traitâ and âimplementorsâ should both be => âgo to implementationâ > And âsendersâ and âclass referencesâ should both be => âlook for referencesâ Excellent analysis and simplification of actions and terminology ! And please also add/maintain CMD-Click for the first and maybe CMD-Shit-Click for the second, everywhere.

Jan. 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Playground key binding...

by Tudor Girba

Hi, The current logic is not specific to the playground, it is the same in all other tools. This probably got lost before we introduced GT because I do not find the logic in Pharo 3.0 either. It would be interesting to salvage this logic. Could someone point me to it? Cheers, Doru > On Jan 19, 2016, at 9:44 AM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > Hi > > a really handy keybinding was > > CMD-b on class to browse a class > such key binding was smart enough to see that when this is not a class binding but a symbol > it was performing an implementor > > Why should I know when the system can do it for me? > > Same CMD-m is doing first a implementor if the receiver was a symbol and then > a class browse when this is a binding. This one is still working. > > I would like to get the behavior **I** implemented in Pharo 30 back. > Why we cannot keep the good things we do? > > Stef > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "When people care, great things can happen."

Jan. 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Playground key binding...

by Guillermo Polito

I agree, I think that "browse class or traitâ and âimplementorsâ should both be => âgo to implementationâ And âsendersâ and âclass referencesâ should both be => âlook for referencesâ The only difference is that today one works for selectors and the other for classes. But we can be polymorphic in the UI also, canât we? :) Afterwards, we could discuss if it is worth it to have two shortcuts for the same thing :). > On 19 ene 2016, at 9:44 a.m., stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > Hi > > a really handy keybinding was > > CMD-b on class to browse a class > such key binding was smart enough to see that when this is not a class binding but a symbol > it was performing an implementor > > Why should I know when the system can do it for me? > > Same CMD-m is doing first a implementor if the receiver was a symbol and then > a class browse when this is a binding. This one is still working. > > I would like to get the behavior **I** implemented in Pharo 30 back. > Why we cannot keep the good things we do? > > Stef >

Jan. 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] How do I reset Spotter?

by Andrei Chis

GTSpotter cleanUp. GTSpotter dontShowPreview Cheers, Andrei On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > I can tell you that I would love that people doing tools produce videos > and books because > they will learn a lot about themselves and their tools. > > RIght now I do not know how to reset Spotter because I want to explain it > from the same > state that the guy will face. > > You make me lose so much time.... you cannot imagine. > I think that I will skip tools that cannot be reset from a menu. > > Stef > >

Jan. 19, 2016

How do I reset Spotter?

by stepharo

I can tell you that I would love that people doing tools produce videos and books because they will learn a lot about themselves and their tools. RIght now I do not know how to reset Spotter because I want to explain it from the same state that the guy will face. You make me lose so much time.... you cannot imagine. I think that I will skip tools that cannot be reset from a menu. Stef

Jan. 19, 2016

Playground key binding...

by stepharo

Hi a really handy keybinding was CMD-b on class to browse a class such key binding was smart enough to see that when this is not a class binding but a symbol it was performing an implementor Why should I know when the system can do it for me? Same CMD-m is doing first a implementor if the receiver was a symbol and then a class browse when this is a binding. This one is still working. I would like to get the behavior **I** implemented in Pharo 30 back. Why we cannot keep the good things we do? Stef

Jan. 19, 2016