I agree, I think that "browse class or traitâ and âimplementorsâ should both be => âgo to implementationâ And âsendersâ and âclass referencesâ should both be => âlook for referencesâ The only difference is that today one works for selectors and the other for classes. But we can be polymorphic in the UI also, canât we? :) Afterwards, we could discuss if it is worth it to have two shortcuts for the same thing :).
On 19 ene 2016, at 9:44 a.m., stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
Hi
a really handy keybinding was
CMD-b on class to browse a class such key binding was smart enough to see that when this is not a class binding but a symbol it was performing an implementor
Why should I know when the system can do it for me?
Same CMD-m is doing first a implementor if the receiver was a symbol and then a class browse when this is a binding. This one is still working.
I would like to get the behavior **I** implemented in Pharo 30 back. Why we cannot keep the good things we do?
Stef