- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Undefined symbol using Exupery VM

by Damien Cassou

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Bryce Kampjes <bryce(a)kampjes.demon.co.uk> wrote: > I've added this to my list of known issues with the VM. It's odd that I > haven't seen it myself as I do use Monticello and these have been my > normal VMs for the last few years. I've just reproduced it again while building the dev-images. It only affects Pharo. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

April 5, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] status of split join in pharo

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

>> > I wrote the split join implementation that is available on mantis > > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874 > > I use it all the time, if you would like to improve on what is > there, please continue to contribute to the mantis page discussion/ > tests and code. That way we will get an polished implementation that > can be added to squeak or to pharo. > > The suggestion to use #species would be fine (I never use species > myself, because I dont understand what its really for). or class the point is that you get back a collection of the same kind of the receiver > > > When stef says "I have checked the code and it looks nice" he didnt > say which code he checked, so I am confused. I looked at the latest version in the repository mentioned by oscar rubyshards > > > Keith > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

April 5, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] status of split join in pharo

by Keith Hodges

Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > Hi Stef, > > Object>>assert: also works with Boolean args, just like > TestCase>>assert: > > Does it make any difference? > > I cannot find the testSplit method you mention. I am looking at > RubyShards-on.6.mcz > > Am I looking in the wrong place? I think Keith has written some more > tests (according to Mantis). Are they part of Keith's tests? > > I think Damien Pollet (cdlm) write splitBy: > > I suggest we rename the package SplitJoin. > > But I want to know who is charge first -- is it Keith, or Damien, or > Stef (or me)? I do not want to step on anyone's toes. > > Cheers, > - on > I wrote the split join implementation that is available on mantis http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874 I use it all the time, if you would like to improve on what is there, please continue to contribute to the mantis page discussion/tests and code. That way we will get an polished implementation that can be added to squeak or to pharo. The suggestion to use #species would be fine (I never use species myself, because I dont understand what its really for). When stef says "I have checked the code and it looks nice" he didnt say which code he checked, so I am confused. Keith

April 5, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] status of split join in pharo

by Oscar Nierstrasz

Hi Stef, Object>>assert: also works with Boolean args, just like TestCase>>assert: Does it make any difference? I cannot find the testSplit method you mention. I am looking at RubyShards-on.6.mcz Am I looking in the wrong place? I think Keith has written some more tests (according to Mantis). Are they part of Keith's tests? I think Damien Pollet (cdlm) write splitBy: I suggest we rename the package SplitJoin. But I want to know who is charge first -- is it Keith, or Damien, or Stef (or me)? I do not want to step on anyone's toes. Cheers, - on On Apr 5, 2009, at 10:33, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > I checked the code and it looks nice > > Now I found > > split: regexString > self assert: regexString size > 0 description: 'Cannot split on empty > regex'. > ^regexString asRegex split: self > > and assert: expects a block. > for the test > > testSplit > self assert: (eg split: 'the') size = 4. self assert: (eg split: 't\w > +e') size = 5. self assert: (eg split: 'hello') size = 1. > it would be nice to have also an assert showing the result and not > just its size > > > then I have a question what splitBy: returns? > does it return a collection that is the same kind of the receiver? > Why do you hard code an OrderedCollection in splitBySubCollection: > aSplitter. > self species would do it too? > Syef > > > On Apr 5, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> What's the status of split and join? >> >> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874 >> >> I need them for a project and since they are not there yet, I have >> gone back to RubyShards. >> >> http://squeaksource.com/RubyShards/ >> >> Keith, do you think this can be integrated into Pharo already, or >> does >> it need some work still? >> >> (I think our implementation is not particularly efficient, but it >> should be serviceable.) >> >> Cheers, >> - on >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

April 5, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] status of split join in pharo

by Oscar Nierstrasz

OK. split: assumes regexes with cannot work for collections, but this can be generalized, as you suggest. Will try to have a look at this. - on On Apr 5, 2009, at 10:26, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > oscar > > it would be nice to see if the implementation make also sense in > presence of other collection. > I do not have the time to check but if a group of people can check and > report this will > help us to take a decision. > I would like to have split and join in general because this is a cool > abstraction. > Stef > > On Apr 5, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> What's the status of split and join? >> >> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874 >> >> I need them for a project and since they are not there yet, I have >> gone back to RubyShards. >> >> http://squeaksource.com/RubyShards/ >> >> Keith, do you think this can be integrated into Pharo already, or >> does >> it need some work still? >> >> (I think our implementation is not particularly efficient, but it >> should be serviceable.) >> >> Cheers, >> - on >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

April 5, 2009

[Pharo-project] [ANN] 10266 Merge tool SUnitGUI Setting Integration Enh

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Issue 710: Merge Tool diff fix Fixes for edge cases when handling conflicts. Fixes for original MC merge browser. SUnitGUI Improvement - do not offer to test coverage of kernel/collection/exception/sunit packages, that will only crash the system - do not consider methods with <ignoreForCoverage> annotation - improving the error messages - don t try show a list if all methods are covered - really save the history - do not wrap abstract methods, they won t be called anyway - update the history even after coverage is run Settings Integration enh - Code cleaning (less classes, more comments) Alain I could not load 45 so I load 39 for now. Stef

April 5, 2009

[Pharo-project] [ANN] 10264 more closure fixes 685 & 10265 unicode

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Issue 685: Closure fixes TmpVariableNode closure from lukas MethodsFromBlockContext from adrian Issue 706: problem with unicode 10262

April 5, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] status of split join in pharo

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

I checked the code and it looks nice Now I found split: regexString self assert: regexString size > 0 description: 'Cannot split on empty regex'. ^regexString asRegex split: self and assert: expects a block. for the test testSplit self assert: (eg split: 'the') size = 4. self assert: (eg split: 't\w +e') size = 5. self assert: (eg split: 'hello') size = 1. it would be nice to have also an assert showing the result and not just its size then I have a question what splitBy: returns? does it return a collection that is the same kind of the receiver? Why do you hard code an OrderedCollection in splitBySubCollection: aSplitter. self species would do it too? Syef On Apr 5, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > What's the status of split and join? > > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874 > > I need them for a project and since they are not there yet, I have > gone back to RubyShards. > > http://squeaksource.com/RubyShards/ > > Keith, do you think this can be integrated into Pharo already, or does > it need some work still? > > (I think our implementation is not particularly efficient, but it > should be serviceable.) > > Cheers, > - on > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

April 5, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] status of split join in pharo

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

oscar it would be nice to see if the implementation make also sense in presence of other collection. I do not have the time to check but if a group of people can check and report this will help us to take a decision. I would like to have split and join in general because this is a cool abstraction. Stef On Apr 5, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > What's the status of split and join? > > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874 > > I need them for a project and since they are not there yet, I have > gone back to RubyShards. > > http://squeaksource.com/RubyShards/ > > Keith, do you think this can be integrated into Pharo already, or does > it need some work still? > > (I think our implementation is not particularly efficient, but it > should be serviceable.) > > Cheers, > - on > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

April 5, 2009

[Pharo-project] status of split join in pharo

by Oscar Nierstrasz

Hi Folks, What's the status of split and join? http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874 I need them for a project and since they are not there yet, I have gone back to RubyShards. http://squeaksource.com/RubyShards/ Keith, do you think this can be integrated into Pharo already, or does it need some work still? (I think our implementation is not particularly efficient, but it should be serviceable.) Cheers, - on

April 5, 2009