OK. split: assumes regexes with cannot work for collections, but this can be generalized, as you suggest. Will try to have a look at this. - on On Apr 5, 2009, at 10:26, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
oscar
it would be nice to see if the implementation make also sense in presence of other collection. I do not have the time to check but if a group of people can check and report this will help us to take a decision. I would like to have split and join in general because this is a cool abstraction. Stef
On Apr 5, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote:
Hi Folks,
What's the status of split and join?
http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874
I need them for a project and since they are not there yet, I have gone back to RubyShards.
http://squeaksource.com/RubyShards/
Keith, do you think this can be integrated into Pharo already, or does it need some work still?
(I think our implementation is not particularly efficient, but it should be serviceable.)
Cheers, - on
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project