October 2016 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Instructions for Pharo 6 64bits

by stepharo

Le 28/10/16 Ã 16:59, Dimitris Chloupis a Ã©crit : > does 64 bit means that we can now take full advantage of the memory of > our system yes > and not have to adhere to a specific limit ? well probably the one of your OS :) > Is that something the current build does or is it planned for future > releases ? This one. > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:19 PM Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com > <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: > > >> On 28 Oct 2016, at 14:22, Thierry Goubier >> <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com <mailto:thierry.goubier@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> apart from the missing SSL support which makes loading complex >> stuff from github a bit painfull, it seems to be usable enough. > > I should work on this :) > > Esteban >

Oct. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Instructions for Pharo 6 64bits

by Dimitris Chloupis

does 64 bit means that we can now take full advantage of the memory of our system and not have to adhere to a specific limit ? Is that something the current build does or is it planned for future releases ? On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:19 PM Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On 28 Oct 2016, at 14:22, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > apart from the missing SSL support which makes loading complex stuff from > github a bit painfull, it seems to be usable enough. > > > I should work on this :) > > Esteban >

Oct. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Instructions for Pharo 6 64bits

by Esteban Lorenzano

> On 28 Oct 2016, at 14:22, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > apart from the missing SSL support which makes loading complex stuff from github a bit painfull, it seems to be usable enough. I should work on this :) Esteban

Oct. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Instructions for Pharo 6 64bits

by Aliaksei Syrel

I faced an issue that FFI calls fail with arguments of type size_t or the value that was passed to C function was completely wrong. For example you pass 1 but get 29834693165 Cheers, Alex On 28 October 2016 at 14:22, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2016-10-28 12:29 GMT+02:00 Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com>: > >> >> >> 2016-10-28 11:56 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: >> >>> VM here: http://bintray.com/estebanlm/pharo-vm/build#files/ >>> Image here: http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo-64.zip >>> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >>> >>> this is still not official (thatâs why is not in official place) so >>> there are a couple of known problems: >>> >>> - version format is different, and that breaks some things in image that >>> depends on it to know what happens >>> - command line is different and probably youâll need to play a bit with >>> options (one or two dashes). >>> - UFFI has some failing tests (but most of it works). >>> >>> I would appreciate some help to report and/or fix the emerging problems. >>> >> >> I'll make myself a Makefile for it and test; if I see it stable enough, >> I'll try to use it on a regular basis and report. >> > > Report: > > apart from the missing SSL support which makes loading complex stuff from > github a bit painfull, it seems to be usable enough. > > OSProcess and GitFileTree work fine. Which means gitfiletree:// urls work, > but not github:// urls. > > I loaded a large project (a compiler!) and saw no issues (apart from a > freetype / wrong glyph issue?). All SmaCC tests are green on it, and my > project tests were green as well. > > Thierry > > > >> >> Thierry >> >> >>> >>> cheers, >>> Esteban >>> >>> On 28 Oct 2016, at 10:39, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> anybody knows how to get (and test) the 64bits version of the Pharo vm >>> and image? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Thierry >>> >>> >>> >> >

Oct. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Instructions for Pharo 6 64bits

by Thierry Goubier

2016-10-28 12:29 GMT+02:00 Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com>: > > > 2016-10-28 11:56 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: > >> VM here: http://bintray.com/estebanlm/pharo-vm/build#files/ >> Image here: http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo-64.zip >> > > Thanks. > > >> >> this is still not official (thatâs why is not in official place) so there >> are a couple of known problems: >> >> - version format is different, and that breaks some things in image that >> depends on it to know what happens >> - command line is different and probably youâll need to play a bit with >> options (one or two dashes). >> - UFFI has some failing tests (but most of it works). >> >> I would appreciate some help to report and/or fix the emerging problems. >> > > I'll make myself a Makefile for it and test; if I see it stable enough, > I'll try to use it on a regular basis and report. > Report: apart from the missing SSL support which makes loading complex stuff from github a bit painfull, it seems to be usable enough. OSProcess and GitFileTree work fine. Which means gitfiletree:// urls work, but not github:// urls. I loaded a large project (a compiler!) and saw no issues (apart from a freetype / wrong glyph issue?). All SmaCC tests are green on it, and my project tests were green as well. Thierry > > Thierry > > >> >> cheers, >> Esteban >> >> On 28 Oct 2016, at 10:39, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> anybody knows how to get (and test) the 64bits version of the Pharo vm >> and image? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Thierry >> >> >> >

Oct. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] GitHub code analytics tools

by Thierry Goubier

2016-10-28 11:07 GMT+02:00 Guille Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com>: > Hi! > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Guillermo, > > Apparently you don't like the github browser-based code review tool? > > What are your objections? > > Do you know of a better tool that is out in the wild or do you just have > visions that code review could be better? > > Better tools are always possible, but it is sometimes nice to use a tool > that you didn't have to build from scratch while creating the better tool:) > > Well, that is in fact my point. I'd like to know options and alternatives. > If the easiest to setup and use is github's one, ok, that's no problem to > me. > > What bothers me the most from the github+filetree combination when > reviewing a pull request, is that it is a file-based review. And finally > you're reviewing the low-level export format, and I get a bit lost... Just > dreaming, maybe there is some tool out there where we can just provide a > kind of plugin to enhance the review? > Maybe a local copy of the pull request (it is just a branch in git terms, after all) and using Iceberg ? Thierry > > But for sure I do not want to do one from scratch :) > > Dale > On 10/27/2016 05:06 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > I would like to have a good code review tool, before having to do one > ad-hoc... > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> With future transition to github I ask myself what tools we will have out >> of the box. >> I google a bit and found these nice service http://ghv.artzub.com. >> Try to search guillep and then pharo-core. It looks really nice. >> >> What other online services you know to analyse github projects? >> > > > >

Oct. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Instructions for Pharo 6 64bits

by Thierry Goubier

2016-10-28 11:56 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: > VM here: http://bintray.com/estebanlm/pharo-vm/build#files/ > Image here: http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo-64.zip > Thanks. > > this is still not official (thatâs why is not in official place) so there > are a couple of known problems: > > - version format is different, and that breaks some things in image that > depends on it to know what happens > - command line is different and probably youâll need to play a bit with > options (one or two dashes). > - UFFI has some failing tests (but most of it works). > > I would appreciate some help to report and/or fix the emerging problems. > I'll make myself a Makefile for it and test; if I see it stable enough, I'll try to use it on a regular basis and report. Thierry > > cheers, > Esteban > > On 28 Oct 2016, at 10:39, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > anybody knows how to get (and test) the 64bits version of the Pharo vm and > image? > > Thanks, > > Thierry > > >

Oct. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Instructions for Pharo 6 64bits

by Esteban Lorenzano

VM here: http://bintray.com/estebanlm/pharo-vm/build#files/ <http://bintray.com/estebanlm/pharo-vm/build#files/> Image here: http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo-64.zip <http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo-64.zip> this is still not official (thatâs why is not in official place) so there are a couple of known problems: - version format is different, and that breaks some things in image that depends on it to know what happens - command line is different and probably youâll need to play a bit with options (one or two dashes). - UFFI has some failing tests (but most of it works). I would appreciate some help to report and/or fix the emerging problems. cheers, Esteban > On 28 Oct 2016, at 10:39, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > anybody knows how to get (and test) the 64bits version of the Pharo vm and image? > > Thanks, > > Thierry

Oct. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] GitHub code analytics tools

by Guille Polito

Hi! -------- Original Message -------- > > Guillermo, > > Apparently you don't like the github browser-based code review tool? > > What are your objections? > > Do you know of a better tool that is out in the wild or do you just > have visions that code review could be better? > > Better tools are always possible, but it is sometimes nice to use a > tool that you didn't have to build from scratch while creating the > better tool:) > Well, that is in fact my point. I'd like to know options and alternatives. If the easiest to setup and use is github's one, ok, that's no problem to me. What bothers me the most from the github+filetree combination when reviewing a pull request, is that it is a file-based review. And finally you're reviewing the low-level export format, and I get a bit lost... Just dreaming, maybe there is some tool out there where we can just provide a kind of plugin to enhance the review? But for sure I do not want to do one from scratch :) > Dale > > On 10/27/2016 05:06 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote: >> I would like to have a good code review tool, before having to do one >> ad-hoc... >> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Denis Kudriashov >> <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com <mailto:dionisiydk@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> With future transition to github I ask myself what tools we will >> have out of the box. >> I google a bit and found these nice service http://ghv.artzub.com. >> Try to search guillep and then pharo-core. It looks really nice. >> >> What other online services you know to analyse github projects? >> >> >

Oct. 28, 2016

Instructions for Pharo 6 64bits

by Thierry Goubier

Hi all, anybody knows how to get (and test) the 64bits version of the Pharo vm and image? Thanks, Thierry

Oct. 28, 2016