I faced an issue that FFI calls fail with arguments of type size_t or the value that was passed to C function was completely wrong. For example you pass 1 but get 29834693165 Cheers, Alex On 28 October 2016 at 14:22, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-10-28 12:29 GMT+02:00 Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com>:
2016-10-28 11:56 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:
VM here: http://bintray.com/estebanlm/pharo-vm/build#files/ Image here: http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo-64.zip
Thanks.
this is still not official (thatâs why is not in official place) so there are a couple of known problems:
- version format is different, and that breaks some things in image that depends on it to know what happens - command line is different and probably youâll need to play a bit with options (one or two dashes). - UFFI has some failing tests (but most of it works).
I would appreciate some help to report and/or fix the emerging problems.
I'll make myself a Makefile for it and test; if I see it stable enough, I'll try to use it on a regular basis and report.
Report:
apart from the missing SSL support which makes loading complex stuff from github a bit painfull, it seems to be usable enough.
OSProcess and GitFileTree work fine. Which means gitfiletree:// urls work, but not github:// urls.
I loaded a large project (a compiler!) and saw no issues (apart from a freetype / wrong glyph issue?). All SmaCC tests are green on it, and my project tests were green as well.
Thierry
Thierry
cheers, Esteban
On 28 Oct 2016, at 10:39, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
anybody knows how to get (and test) the 64bits version of the Pharo vm and image?
Thanks,
Thierry