November 2015 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Removing Object >> #name

by stepharo

Thanks you both. I love your attitude :) Stef Le 10/11/15 11:35, Sven Van Caekenberghe a Ã©crit : > Hi Guillermo et al, > >> On 10 Nov 2015, at 11:31, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> I was following the discussion about Class>>#name and Object>>#name so I checked what happened if I removed #name from Object. >> >> 1) The system did not blew up. I could open a browser and a test runner. >> >> 2) I could use spotter, look for a class, dive in, look for methodsâ¦ Same for the inspector. >> >> 3) I ran all the tests in the image. >> - I saw some failures in GT* and Glamour. I ran them in a new image and they are not failing so maybe they are broken because of the change or some side effect of the tests? >> - Then I saw some failures of OpenToolTest and MBGroupInfoTest that *do look related* >> >> 4) I created a Package and it worked >> >> 5) I tried to create a class and it exploded with RBBrowserEnvironment DNU #includesKey:. >> This however explodes also in a clean image so I do not think it is related. >> >> 6) I could however create new methods... >> >> Of course integrating such a little change is still scary :). But I can propose a sliceâ¦ Votes in favor? :) >> >> Guille > Some months ago I did some more experiments, like you, please see this old thread (at the end): > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7241/Object-name-should-best-be-removed > > I am certainly willing to help. > > Sven >

Nov. 10, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Removing Object >> #name

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Hi Guillermo et al, > On 10 Nov 2015, at 11:31, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey, > > I was following the discussion about Class>>#name and Object>>#name so I checked what happened if I removed #name from Object. > > 1) The system did not blew up. I could open a browser and a test runner. > > 2) I could use spotter, look for a class, dive in, look for methodsâ¦ Same for the inspector. > > 3) I ran all the tests in the image. > - I saw some failures in GT* and Glamour. I ran them in a new image and they are not failing so maybe they are broken because of the change or some side effect of the tests? > - Then I saw some failures of OpenToolTest and MBGroupInfoTest that *do look related* > > 4) I created a Package and it worked > > 5) I tried to create a class and it exploded with RBBrowserEnvironment DNU #includesKey:. > This however explodes also in a clean image so I do not think it is related. > > 6) I could however create new methods... > > Of course integrating such a little change is still scary :). But I can propose a sliceâ¦ Votes in favor? :) > > Guille Some months ago I did some more experiments, like you, please see this old thread (at the end): https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7241/Object-name-should-best-be-removed I am certainly willing to help. Sven

Nov. 10, 2015

Removing Object >> #name

by Guillermo Polito

Hey, I was following the discussion about Class>>#name and Object>>#name so I checked what happened if I removed #name from Object. 1) The system did not blew up. I could open a browser and a test runner. 2) I could use spotter, look for a class, dive in, look for methodsâ¦ Same for the inspector. 3) I ran all the tests in the image. - I saw some failures in GT* and Glamour. I ran them in a new image and they are not failing so maybe they are broken because of the change or some side effect of the tests? - Then I saw some failures of OpenToolTest and MBGroupInfoTest that *do look related* 4) I created a Package and it worked 5) I tried to create a class and it exploded with RBBrowserEnvironment DNU #includesKey:. This however explodes also in a clean image so I do not think it is related. 6) I could however create new methods... Of course integrating such a little change is still scary :). But I can propose a sliceâ¦ Votes in favor? :) Guille

Nov. 10, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

by Stephan Eggermont

On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote: > Thanks I assume you want it working in Pharo5? There was no #'pharo5.x' Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16 Author: StephanEggermont Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15 In-place pharo5 version added

Nov. 10, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is RBRefactoryChange alive, and what do I use for recategorization

by Max Leske

Martin has been working on change reification to manage history. Iâm not sure however, if thatâs been integrated. CCâd to Martin. > On 06 Nov 2015, at 15:25, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone. > > in my critic projects I need a concept of a âchangeâ the can be previewed, executed or combined with other changes. I.e. if a critic can propose an automated solution, it has to be _something_. At the moment Iâve started to use RBRefactoryChange, but I want to know whether it is the thing to use, or maybe someone is preparing a replacement. Because classes have no comments. no real diff support and so onâ¦ > > If it is the thing to use, which change should I use for a recategorization (change protocol) of a method? > > Thanks. > Uko

Nov. 10, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

by stepharo

Thanks Le 10/11/15 01:43, Stephan Eggermont a Ã©crit : > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Sport/Sport > > Stephan > > >

Nov. 10, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

by Stephan Eggermont

http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Sport/Sport Stephan

Nov. 10, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

by Esteban A. Maringolo

If Swazoo is available, I guess Sport will be too because it depends on it. Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo

Nov. 9, 2015

Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

by stepharo

Nov. 9, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Ubuntu fullscreen problems

by J.F. Rick

Works like a charm: both toggling modes and using the Unity pager to switch workspaces. Thanks! Jeff On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 2015-10-28 20:14 GMT+01:00 J.F. Rick <self(a)je77.com>: > >> Cool. I guess if there is a bug report on squeak then there is no reason >> to create one on pharo. If you need someone to test a solution on Ubuntu >> 15.10, let me know. >> > > Hi Jeff, > > can you check this version, it works for me on > > DISTRIB_ID="elementary OS" > DISTRIB_RELEASE=0.3.1 > DISTRIB_CODENAME=freya > DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="elementary OS Freya" > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8yEahnuIem2VGJlejJpUjZfZHc/view?usp=shari… > > it should work on Ubuntu, but I don|t have Ubuntu 15 installed. > > > > >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:21 AM Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> 2015-10-28 15:35 GMT+01:00 Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com>: >>> >>>> I think there must be some incompatibility between Pharo and the host >>>> window manager/desktop environment. >>>> >>>> On Debian/dwm (I am using Ubuntu VM) I can reproduce (1), but not (2). >>>> >>>> There is however interesting behavior... if I try to switch desktop >>>> while in fullscreen it doesn't switch, however once I switch back to >>>> non-fullscreen, suddenly I jump to the other desktop, as if the keyboard >>>> shortcut for the switch got buffered somewhere... >>>> >>>> Opening a issue in FogzBugz is a good idea so it doesn't get forgotten. >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:15 PM, J.F. Rick <self(a)je77.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everybody, >>>>> >>>>> I just upgraded to Ubuntu 15.10 and am using Unity User Interface. I >>>>> want Pharo to use the full screen (i.e., above the menu bar and launcher). >>>>> Inside Pharo, I can choose "Toggle full screen mode". This works to some >>>>> extent but has some problems: >>>>> >>>>> (1) I can no longer switch applications or desktops (i.e., pager). So >>>>> it stops me doing work where I move between Pharo and a browser. This may >>>>> be expected functionality. >>>>> >>>>> (2) More problematically, when I try to switch out of full screen mode >>>>> by choosing "Toggle full screen mode", the Pharo interface completely >>>>> disappears (just a giant gray area) and no mouse or keyboard events seem to >>>>> register. I have to use command line to kill it. In good news, I can use >>>>> "save and quit" instead and relaunching it just has it in maximum mode >>>>> (full screen but launcher and menu bar are visible). I can then toggle full >>>>> screen mode twice to get back to full screen. >>>>> >>>>> I searched for this on FogBugz but found nothing. Is there a >>>>> workaround? This seems like a VM issue. Is there a newer VM that fixes >>>>> this? I just used the most recent one on the Pharo 4.0 download page. >>>>> >>>>> If nobody has a fix, I'll open a case on FogBugz. This isn't a large >>>>> problem but it would be nice to have this >>>>> >>>> >>> It is a know problem (with possible fixes) >>> (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7812) >>> You can not switch back from fullscreen on a linux 64-bit system ( >>> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7833) (maybe not only 32bit issue, >>> but just the more recent windowmanager) >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Jeff >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>

Nov. 9, 2015