Thanks you both. I love your attitude :) Stef Le 10/11/15 11:35, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
Hi Guillermo et al,
On 10 Nov 2015, at 11:31, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey,
I was following the discussion about Class>>#name and Object>>#name so I checked what happened if I removed #name from Object.
1) The system did not blew up. I could open a browser and a test runner.
2) I could use spotter, look for a class, dive in, look for methods⦠Same for the inspector.
3) I ran all the tests in the image. - I saw some failures in GT* and Glamour. I ran them in a new image and they are not failing so maybe they are broken because of the change or some side effect of the tests? - Then I saw some failures of OpenToolTest and MBGroupInfoTest that *do look related*
4) I created a Package and it worked
5) I tried to create a class and it exploded with RBBrowserEnvironment DNU #includesKey:. This however explodes also in a clean image so I do not think it is related.
6) I could however create new methods...
Of course integrating such a little change is still scary :). But I can propose a slice⦠Votes in favor? :)
Guille Some months ago I did some more experiments, like you, please see this old thread (at the end):
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7241/Object-name-should-best-be-removed
I am certainly willing to help.
Sven