November 2014 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Compilation error of the PharoEnterprise book with luatex

by Ben Coman

Luc Fabresse wrote: > Hi All, > > I cannot compile the latest version in > SquareBracketAssociates/EnterprisePharo.git > My problem is that the "FiraSans" cannot be found. > But in common.tex, the font path is correctly set up and the font is there. > > So on CI which version of luatex is used? > I did not find it in the Jenkins log. > > I am using LuaTeX, Version beta-0.79.1 (TeX Live 2014/MacPorts 2014_1) > (rev 4971) > > Cheers, > > #Luc I don't know the answer, instead... its an interesting exercise to work out how to get a shell on the CI slaves https://wiki.inria.fr/ciportal/Slaves_Access_Tutorial Then you can check the version yourself :) Happy fishing... cheers -ben

Nov. 28, 2014

Compilation error of the PharoEnterprise book with luatex

by Luc Fabresse

Hi All, I cannot compile the latest version in SquareBracketAssociates/ EnterprisePharo.git My problem is that the "FiraSans" cannot be found. But in common.tex, the font path is correctly set up and the font is there. So on CI which version of luatex is used? I did not find it in the Jenkins log. I am using LuaTeX, Version beta-0.79.1 (TeX Live 2014/MacPorts 2014_1) (rev 4971) Cheers, #Luc

Nov. 28, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Fix wikipedia article

by Sebastian Sastre

Ahh yeah. Youâre right, I read it too quick and in the wrong context and thought was talking about Purism in programming languages giving only functional as example. Never mind about that pageâ¦ And yet we could start one where we could talk about it. Here is an idea: LISP: "Everything is an Expressionâ Haskell and Miranda: "Everything is a Functionâ Self and Smalltalk: "Everything is an Object" could easily do a wikipedia page on âParadigmatic Programming Languagesâ or something like that Iâm not an academic but sounds like their beach and sounds to me it could be quite a reference > On Nov 28, 2014, at 2:08 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > >> On 28 Nov 2014, at 16:55, Sebastian Sastre <sebastian(a)flowingconcept.com> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Just a heads upâ¦ >> >> This is asking for a fix: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_(programming_language) >> >> LISP and Self and Smalltalk people should add their voice there >> >> Unleash your nerd :) > > I don't understand, what do you mean ? > > The page describes some language called Pure that seems to be legit, so what is wrong with that (apart from the name being ambitious, pretentious) ? > > And there is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharo which is OK but needs some love. > >

Nov. 28, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core] b0326f: 40390

by GitHub

Branch: refs/heads/4.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: b0326f5e79a6040644317b02654b5d1a5991261e https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/b0326f5e79a6040644317b02… Author: Jenkins Build Server <board(a)pharo-project.org> Date: 2014-11-28 (Fri, 28 Nov 2014) Changed paths: M Growl.package/GrowlMorph.class/class/settings/growlSettingsOn_.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/README.md R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/class/specs/defaultSpec.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/class/specs/title.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/class/specs/topSpec.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/definition.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/environment.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/environment_.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/listModel1.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/listModel1_.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/listModel2.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/listModel2_.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/listModel3.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/listModel3_.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/process.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/process_.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/status.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/status_.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/textModel.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/accessing/textModel_.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/initialization/initializePresenter.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/initialization/initializeWidgets.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/processing/basicSearch_.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/CodeCriticBrowser.class/instance/protocol/rules_.st M NautilusRefactoring.package/NautilusRefactoring.class/instance/class/removeClasses_.st M NautilusRefactoring.package/NautilusRefactoring.class/instance/option/selectVariableToMoveMethodTo_class_.st M NautilusRefactoring.package/NautilusRefactoring.class/instance/private-method/privateDeprecateMethodFor_.st R NautilusRefactoring.package/extension/TClassDescription/instance/renameMethodAllItem_.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script390.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update40390.st M ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/public/commentForCurrentUpdate.st A Traits.package/TClassDescription.class/instance/as yet unclassified/renameMethodAllItem_.st Log Message: ----------- 40390 14544 tiny code critique cleanup of NautilusRefactoring https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14544 14543 Pharo4.0 settings do have Appearance and appearance (twice the entries that is) https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14543 http://files.pharo.org/image/40/40390.zip

Nov. 28, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/40390 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

Nov. 28, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] 7350 window drag ghosting while progress bar is moving

by Esteban Lorenzano

this was happening because of morphic colliding with a process, so I think is safe to close it. Esteban > On 28 Nov 2014, at 17:05, Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> wrote: > > > A while ago I logged an issue "window drag ghosting while progress bar is moving" [1] - but I haven't noticed this for a long time. Before I close it, has anyone had any similar problems with Pharo 4 ? > > [1] https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?7350 > > cheers -ben > > > <window+move+ghosting.png>

Nov. 28, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Fix wikipedia article

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 28 Nov 2014, at 16:55, Sebastian Sastre <sebastian(a)flowingconcept.com> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Just a heads upâ¦ > > This is asking for a fix: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_(programming_language) > > LISP and Self and Smalltalk people should add their voice there > > Unleash your nerd :) I don't understand, what do you mean ? The page describes some language called Pure that seems to be legit, so what is wrong with that (apart from the name being ambitious, pretentious) ? And there is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharo which is OK but needs some love.

Nov. 28, 2014

7350 window drag ghosting while progress bar is moving

by Ben Coman

A while ago I logged an issue "window drag ghosting while progress bar is moving" [1] - but I haven't noticed this for a long time. Before I close it, has anyone had any similar problems with Pharo 4 ? [1] https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?7350 cheers -ben

Nov. 28, 2014

Fix wikipedia article

by Sebastian Sastre

Hi guys, Just a heads upâ¦ This is asking for a fix: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_(programming_language) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_(programming_language)> LISP and Self and Smalltalk people should add their voice there Unleash your nerd :)

Nov. 28, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] [squeak-dev] Re: IdentitySet>>collect:

by Marcus Denker

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > > On 28 Nov 2014, at 15:35, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > > > >> On 27 Nov 2014, at 08:21, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On 26 Nov 2014, at 19:19, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> IdentitySet>>collect: answers a Set, not an IdentitySet. Anyone > else agree this is a serious bug? Anyone else disagree? > >>> > >>> WTF?? > >>> > >>> (IdentitySet withAll: #(1 2 3 1.0 2.0 3.0)) collect: [:e| e] a Set(1.0 > 2 3) > >> > >> Yes, I would say so. I think we fixed some others like that already > (not 100% sure) > >> > >> I added an issue tracker entry > >> > >> 14535 IdentitySet>>collect: answers a Set, not an IdentitySet. > >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14535 > >> > > > > #collect: directly uses Set in Set>>#collect, I committed a fix (to the > issue tracker, to be reviewed) > > to use âself speciesâ instead (plus the example from above as a test in > IdentitySetTest). > > > > Marcus > > I think that is the most logical thing to do, it is what I would expect. > > I know others have cases where that is not really what you want (some of > Set's subclasses are pretty special), but it is still a good default, while > #collect:as: can be used for all other cases (and subclasses can override > #species again if they want). > > Hmm... errors found by the test runner on that change. https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-4.0-Issue-Validator/17683//artifact/val… So we will need to check... Marcus

Nov. 28, 2014