April 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Question about the Refactoring Browser

by Jan van de Sandt

Thanks, If I understand correctly I can get a refactoring code model of the unloaded code, but I cannot run the code critics on the model. Ok, I will have a look what functionality this model provides. And I have to figure out how to construct this model using a collection of Monticello packages. Jan. On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com > wrote: > This week there was similar thread: > http://forum.world.st/Code-Critics-for-unloaded-projects-td3425020.html > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Jan van de Sandt <jvdsandt(a)gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I want to analyze some Smalltalk code in a collection of Monticello >> packages without actually loading these packages in the image. Can I use the >> Refactoring Browser for this? >> >> Jan. >> > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > >

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Links section for url shortcuts in the Pharo website

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Hi Adrian. Lots of times I found myself trying to remember the Pharo url shortcuts. I mean all of these: > > http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/stable-core > http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/stable > http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/unstable-core > http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/unstable > > http://issues.pharo-project.org > http://ci.pharo-project.org > http://book.pharo-project.org > http://wiki.pharo-project.org > > Can we create a new section somewhere in the Pharo website and list all those links ? > Adrian did put them directl on the front page yesterday: http://www.pharo-project.org/home -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] A lil simplification of MorphTreeNodeMorph

by Igor Stasenko

and a little more cleanup (should be applied after theTreee) now a block which responsible for providing an icon for concrete item, actually could provide a morph, which means that one could put there an iconic button instead of simple image. -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [Vm-dev] OSS sound plugin.

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Hi. Does someone know if this was finally done? On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Lemuus <lemuus(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, is it possible to include the vm-sound-OSS sound plugin in the cog > build on Hudson?. This is the only plugin that seems to work on linux. > Thanks. > Daniel Galdames G. > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

April 6, 2011

[Pharo-project] Links section for url shortcuts in the Pharo website

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Hi Adrian. Lots of times I found myself trying to remember the Pharo url shortcuts. I mean all of these: http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/stable-core http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/stable http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/unstable-core http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/unstable http://issues.pharo-project.org http://ci.pharo-project.org http://book.pharo-project.org http://wiki.pharo-project.org Can we create a new section somewhere in the Pharo website and list all those links ? Thanks a lot in advance, -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Question about the Refactoring Browser

by Mariano Martinez Peck

This week there was similar thread: http://forum.world.st/Code-Critics-for-unloaded-projects-td3425020.html On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Jan van de Sandt <jvdsandt(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to analyze some Smalltalk code in a collection of Monticello > packages without actually loading these packages in the image. Can I use the > Refactoring Browser for this? > > Jan. > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

April 6, 2011

[Pharo-project] Question about the Refactoring Browser

by Jan van de Sandt

Hi, I want to analyze some Smalltalk code in a collection of Monticello packages without actually loading these packages in the image. Can I use the Refactoring Browser for this? Jan.

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Fwd: Actions done in 1.3

by laurent laffont

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> > Date: 6 April 2011 13:55 > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Actions done in 1.3 > To: laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> > > > On 6 April 2011 10:30, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Planning is also important. > >> > >> Time is good, but another thing is i think we should think about, > >> what features we want to be in new release, and do not release until > >> they delivered. > > > > I don't really like this. I prefer rhythm, agility. Timeboxing enables > > maximum value in each release. If a feature is really important, it will > be > > on time. If not on time, it means it was no so important. > > Always green test is a must-have. > > > >> > >> Besides bug fixing and minor improvements, there should be some > >> functionality which we want to have in new release, > > > > That should be a goal, but don't delay a release because the feature is > not > > here. If releases are often ( for example every 3 months), shorter, it > won't > > be a big problem to wait for the next one. > > I prefer to have a release *now* without my feature and wait 3 months for > > the next release than no release and waiting for 3 months more with less > and > > less energy. > > > > But you don't have to wait, if you want to stay on bleeding edge, you > know how to do that. > Just go to hudson and dowload freshly built 1.3 image. > I won't do this for production. We need a officially released image. Because if you can pick any image at any moment and declare it new release, > then i don't understand why do we need releases at all? > Because people build applications / frameworks they declare compatible with a fixed version of Pharo. > What makes release to be release , when you can download latest > version at any moment? > The date :) Ubuntu is released every 6 months. That gives a rhythm. Integrates new stuff, freeze, release. Same for Gnome and KDE. Linux kernel has a 2 weeks merge window then go rc. We have learned the benefits of fixed iteration with agile methods & extreme programming. > That's why i saying that from release to release cleanup and fixes is > good, but there should be some major functional changes, > which worth to be labeled as a new version. > And if you don't have them, then there is no point to make a release. > In three months there's a lot of stuff which enters Pharo. That's enough for me to justify a release and get feedback from users. Laurent. > > > Laurent. > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > >

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] abouth nautilus and the removal of CodeHolder hierarchy

by Benjamin

I think that as soon as MorphTreeMorph is improved, you can use it for SMx, or take it as it is right now, and apply fixes ^^ Ben On Apr 6, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Fernando Olivero wrote: > what about my initial question? it got buried beneath other > discussions in this thread. > Ben, can you give your opinion ? Im interested because for the SMx > port, this would help in narrowing the classes to import. > > Fernando > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor.girba(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 6 Apr 2011, at 08:16, Alain Plantec wrote: >> >>> Le 05/04/2011 22:03, Alain Plantec a Ã©crit : >>>> Le 05/04/2011 20:57, StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : >>>>> A new browser :) >>>>> Supporting >>>>> - groups >>>>> - package >>>>> - declarative menus >>>>> - environment selection >>>>> - scoped actions >>>>> - soon refactoring >>>>> >>>>> but right now a bit too slow because of the HUGGGGGGEEEEEE trees build by TreeMorphTreeMorph >>>> yes, maybe MorphTreeMorph is not the good tree to use here. >>>> why not use a simpler one ? >>> or try with LazyMorphTreeMorph even it should be improved. (it should be changed to build the list in background). >> >> That would be super cool :) >> >> Doru >> >> >>>> Alain >>>> >>>>>> Squeaksource simply says "A new browser" >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Alexandre >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Presenting is storytelling." >> >> >> >

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week

by Fernando Olivero

Excellent ! It's time to move past squeaksource.com. Would be nice to know the features that will be offered, at least in comparison with current squeaksource (besides the image crashing, and bothering the always helpful Bern phd students). Fernando On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Nicolas Petton <petton.nicolas(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 Ã 13:07 +0200, Tudor Girba a Ã©crit : >> > Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a >> > possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? >> >> There is nothing at the moment to migrate. >> >> I guess you'll just have to move your packages from squeaksource to >> smalltalkhub, so a simple script could do the trick. > > This is awesome. THanks ESUG! > > And the history?Â I mean, is this a new front end for a squeaksource server > ? > > thanks > >> >> Cheers, >> Nicolas >> >> -- >> Nicolas Petton >> http://www.nicolas-petton.fr >> >> > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > >

April 6, 2011