I think that as soon as MorphTreeMorph is improved, you can use it for SMx, or take it as it is right now, and apply fixes ^^ Ben On Apr 6, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Fernando Olivero wrote:
what about my initial question? it got buried beneath other discussions in this thread. Ben, can you give your opinion ? Im interested because for the SMx port, this would help in narrowing the classes to import.
Fernando
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor.girba@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On 6 Apr 2011, at 08:16, Alain Plantec wrote:
Le 05/04/2011 22:03, Alain Plantec a écrit :
Le 05/04/2011 20:57, Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
A new browser :) Supporting - groups - package - declarative menus - environment selection - scoped actions - soon refactoring
but right now a bit too slow because of the HUGGGGGGEEEEEE trees build by TreeMorphTreeMorph yes, maybe MorphTreeMorph is not the good tree to use here. why not use a simpler one ? or try with LazyMorphTreeMorph even it should be improved. (it should be changed to build the list in background).
That would be super cool :)
Doru
Alain
Squeaksource simply says "A new browser"
Cheers, Alexandre
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Presenting is storytelling."