November 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] Pharo integration in enterprise feedback

by laurent laffont

Hi, I'm looking for feedback on Pharo integration in enterprise. Especially how you have managed to put Pharo in your enterprise. For example, I'm involved in web application development in other languages. For functional testing I'm able to script Selenium using Pharo thanks to WebTester. So Pharo has made a small step at my work. I'm looking for such stories. Cheers, Laurent Laffont Pharo Smalltalk Screencasts: http://www.pharocasts.com/ Blog: http://magaloma.blogspot.com/

Nov. 25, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 2734 in pharo: Conflict between Shout and PluggableTextMorph in Pharo 1.2

by Igor Stasenko

good, that will mean that OB can be loaded into Pharo 1.2 On 25 November 2010 20:27, <pharo(a)googlecode.com> wrote: > Updates: > Â Â Â Â Status: Closed > > Comment #6 on issue 2734 by marcus.denker: Conflict between Shout and > PluggableTextMorph in Pharo 1.2 > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2734 > > I think this has been fixed > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Nov. 25, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] How to copy a CompiledMethod?

by Igor Stasenko

On 25 November 2010 20:44, Gabriel HernÃ¡n Barbuto <gbarbuto(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to make a complete duplicate of a CompiledMethod. I > started with CompiledMethod>>#copyWithTrailerBytes: but I think that > this way still leaves some things to copy. It duplicates all the > literals, but I think that it doesn't duplicate a Pragma if for > example, the method has one. > AFAIR, pragmas are stored as one of literals. So, it actually should also make a copy of pragmas. > Is there a proper way to completely make deep copy of a > CompiledMethod? I mean, without writing my own. If there is a way to > do it, I don't want to duplicate it. > if you tell more, why #copy is not enough for you. > Thanks in advance. > Gabriel > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Nov. 25, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3291 in pharo: Missing text field with completion

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Nov 25, 2010, at 9:57 PM, Francisco Ortiz PeÃ±aloza wrote: > WITH recently used on top Ok I see :) > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:26 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Francisco Ortiz PeÃ±aloza wrote: > > > Hi, as ppl use to say a picture is worth a thousand words (or two thousands in bad written english) > > > > Imho it should look like this, without the static list and with recently used on top :) > > why because I most of the time look for something that I already browsed. > > >

Nov. 25, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3291 in pharo: Missing text field with completion

by Francisco Ortiz PeÃ±aloza

WITH recently used on top On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:26 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Francisco Ortiz PeÃ±aloza wrote: > > > Hi, as ppl use to say a picture is worth a thousand words (or two > thousands in bad written english) > > > > Imho it should look like this, without the static list and with recently > used on top :) > > why because I most of the time look for something that I already browsed. > > >

Nov. 25, 2010

[Pharo-project] Issue 3326 in pharo: SourceReference>>parseTimestampFrom: still chokes

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: johanbri...(a)me.com Labels: Milestone-1.2 New issue 3326 by johanbri...(a)me.com: SourceReference>>parseTimestampFrom: still chokes http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3326 Improved fix for issue #3292 Fix put in PharoInbox in System-Support-JohanBrichau.408

Nov. 25, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3292 in pharo: SourceReference>>parseTimestampFrom: chokes on 'tk 2/18/97'

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #5 on issue 3292 by johanbri...(a)me.com: SourceReference>>parseTimestampFrom: chokes on 'tk 2/18/97' http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3292 Fix put in PharoInbox in System-Support-JohanBrichau.408

Nov. 25, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] RBScanner>>#initializeClassificationTable

by Levente Uzonyi

On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Lukas Renggli wrote: >>> That's fair, because you can't use underscores in selectors in Pharo. >> >> Strange because I was sure that we integrate it that behavior to help people calling C function. > > The above statement is wrong. Of course underscores can be used in > selectors and variables for a long time already. My statement is wrong (I forgot to turn off the setting when I checked), but yours is also wrong. If underscore assignments are allowed, then you can't use underscore selectors and vica versa. Levente > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > >

Nov. 25, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] RBScanner>>#initializeClassificationTable

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Nov 25, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: >>> That's fair, because you can't use underscores in selectors in Pharo. >> >> Strange because I was sure that we integrate it that behavior to help people calling C function. > > The above statement is wrong. Of course underscores can be used in > selectors and variables for a long time already. Thanks lukas. I was surprised and I was starting to look in the bugentry. So you saved me some time. Apparently there is no setting to control it. Do you know how to configure it so that I enter a bug entry to make sure that we get a setting? > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch >

Nov. 25, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3297 in pharo: [Kernel Dependencies] Object>>#notifyWithLabel:

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #1 on issue 3297 by stephane.ducasse: [Kernel Dependencies] Object>>#notifyWithLabel: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3297 Indeed we should remove it (deprecate) it from object and move it to another class

Nov. 25, 2010