November 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12233

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

12233 ----- - Issue 3219: Brand new Finder. Thanks Benjamin. This looks really cool.

Nov. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3215 in pharo: hex and others

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: closed Comment #2 on issue 3215 by stephane.ducasse: hex and others http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3215 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Nov. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3219 in pharo: The best Finder ever ^^

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: Milestone-1.2 Comment #1 on issue 3219 by stephane.ducasse: The best Finder ever ^^ http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3219 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Nov. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3221 in pharo: New Class queries for variables (class and pool)

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: Milestone-1.2 Comment #1 on issue 3221 by stephane.ducasse: New Class queries for variables (class and pool) http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3221 benj please tag entry with fixed when there are ok for integration else we do not see them.

Nov. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3216 in pharo: [enh] Support for Metacello in Monticello

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #5 on issue 3216 by stephane.ducasse: [enh] Support for Metacello in Monticello http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3216 also the menu are not Uppercased anymore. I suggest that you do a merge in the latest unstable to understand what I mean.

Nov. 11, 2010

[Pharo-project] bitmapSTreamTests broken

by stephane ducasse

hi guys I'm trying to find why BitmapStreamTests got broken in 12199 they were green and red in the following one We need to push hudson now that it is ready.... Stef

Nov. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] for the sprint at Buenos Ares

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

>> yes today normally. >> > > No, we are far away from B-A... and I wonder how this will work with the talks in parallel. indeed too bad you get a nice occasion to create good energy :) I'm warming up and integrating some fixes now. Stef

Nov. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] for the sprint at Buenos Ares

by Marcus Denker

On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:41 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > yes today normally. > No, we are far away from B-A... and I wonder how this will work with the talks in parallel. > Stef > > On Nov 11, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Juan Vuletich wrote: > >> StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >>> It would be good that you are available on chat or IRC so that before jumping into a fix you ask if it makes sense to work on it now. >>> I will be online around 15h paris time. >>> >>> Stef >> >> Will there be a Pharo Sprint in Buenos Aires (the city)? If so, I'd like to join. >> >> Cheers, >> Juan Vuletich >> > > -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Nov. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] for the sprint at Buenos Ares

by Mariano Martinez Peck

heheheh no, it is not buenos aires, it is Concepcion del Uruguay, Entre Rios ;) On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:40 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > wrote: > yes today normally. > > Stef > > On Nov 11, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Juan Vuletich wrote: > > > StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> It would be good that you are available on chat or IRC so that before > jumping into a fix you ask if it makes sense to work on it now. > >> I will be online around 15h paris time. > >> > >> Stef > > > > Will there be a Pharo Sprint in Buenos Aires (the city)? If so, I'd like > to join. > > > > Cheers, > > Juan Vuletich > > > > >

Nov. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3216 in pharo: [enh] Support for Metacello in Monticello

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Comment Comment #4 on issue 3216 by stephane.ducasse: [enh] Support for Metacello in Monticello http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3216 I do not understand why this code changes the addSlice implementation? Why do you do that/ Slices have nothing to do with metacello. Why dirty packages are removed? why PseudoClass>>asClassDefinition is removed..... Sorry but it looks plain bad!!!!

Nov. 11, 2010