Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3216 in pharo: [enh] Support for Metacello in Monticello

Updates: Status: Comment Comment #4 on issue 3216 by stephane.ducasse: [enh] Support for Metacello in Monticello http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3216 I do not understand why this code changes the addSlice implementation? Why do you do that/ Slices have nothing to do with metacello. Why dirty packages are removed? why PseudoClass>>asClassDefinition is removed..... Sorry but it looks plain bad!!!!