January 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] testing the linux vm of pharo-project

by Schwab,Wilhelm K

There are Linux users who won't touch binaries. I'm not one of them, though I do have some standards - one might say I spook easily. For something as bleeding edge as Pharo, I would not expect to get away with apt-get. Even if Pharo were installed complete with an entry in a gnome menu, I would still end up creating my own shell scripts and menu entries to load specific images with specific vms. What I would like is source for whatever vm we recommend using. I would also like an Alien plugin, the absence of which only serves to increase my interest in the source. Bill -----Original Message----- From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of csrabak(a)bol.com.br Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:39 PM To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] testing the linux vm of pharo-project I think that presently the motto is "first is better to have the package for your distro, then..." Just my 0.01999... -- Cesar Rabak GNU/Linux User 52247. Get counted: http://counter.li.org/ Em 19/01/2010 12:52, laurent laffont < laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com > escreveu: Some thoughts: In the Linux world it's better to have the source code first, and compiled version for convenience. For squeak-3.11 there's the source code and it's easy to build following instructions included in the README. It's clean. For exupery-vm several people have already asked for source code on this list to create packages for their favorite distrib. Â Furthermore the binary is named squeak, not pharo-vm or whatever.... not really cool. Lot of garbage in the archive. Exupery vm for windows is cleaner (but contains one file called Squeak.exe ;) ). Why on Mac it's squeak 4.2.2 b1, on windows/linux squeak 3.11 ? I suppose there's an influence on unit tests / performance / .... Finally I don't know why there's an "alternative" download ... I think the alternative stuff should be on the wiki, not on the basic download page. Cheers, LaurentÂ 2010/1/19 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> I don't know. The ideal will be to ask Squeak people for a Squeak-3.11.3.2135 with FTPlugin compiled. In the meanwhile, I will then put exupery are original and that one as alternative. What do you think ? 2010/1/19 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> How do you compile FTPlugin in squeak 3.11 Â ? LaurentÂ 2010/1/19 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> Ok...so: pharo exupery vm as FTPlugin compiled and 3.11. doesn't. And both are closure-enable. Does someone have a compiled squeak-unix-vmÂ with FTPlugin ? because otherwise, I think I would rather to put again Exupery as the default one. Opinions? 2010/1/19 George Herolyants <george.herolyants(a)gmail.com> So, here are the results (see attachments). On the background of each pharo screenshot you can see the version number of the vm, and command line I used to run pharo image with this vm. As you can see results are far better for the pharo-exupery-linux-vm (which means 0.15.2f), because it has FTPlugin compiled, and squeak-unix-vm (which means 3.11.3-2135) hasn't. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Jan. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11167

by Alexandre Bergel

Mariano, I was wondering whether you have a script for Pharo-Dev based on 11167. Cheers, Alexandre On 19 Jan 2010, at 15:08, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > 945 has to be in 1.0 also. > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:06 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > > wrote: > > 11167 > ----- > > - Issue 945: Annoying bug: > UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #mimeTypes > -polymorph updates > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Jan. 19, 2010

[Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11168

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

11168 ----- - debugit back on track tx mariano! - PolymorphTaskBar Yeah!!!

Jan. 19, 2010

[Pharo-project] I would like to give a try to integrate the Exception changes

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

so I will do 4 updates and if something bad happen I will rollback all the 4 last updates in a row. I cannot really do otherwise so after 11168 let me some times to try before updating :) After I would like to integrate the buffer filestream changes Stef

Jan. 19, 2010

[Pharo-project] Seaside + TDD

by Mariano Abel Coca

Hi everyone, I'm trying to develop using TDD with seaside 3.0, but honestly, I couldn't find any framework or package that works fine with it. I've tried Albatross and Seaside Testing, both of them work great with Seaside 2.8, but fails to run or even to load in seaside 3.0. Any other suggestions? Thanks in advance. Mariano.

Jan. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] testing the linux vm of pharo-project

by csrabak＠bol.com.br

I think that presently the motto is "first is better to have the package for your distro, then..." Just my 0.01999... -- Cesar Rabak GNU/Linux User 52247. Get counted: http://counter.li.org/ Em 19/01/2010 12:52, laurent laffont < laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com > escreveu: Some thoughts: In the Linux world it's better to have the source code first, and compiled version for convenience. For squeak-3.11 there's the source code and it's easy to build following instructions included in the README. It's clean. For exupery-vm several people have already asked for source code on this list to create packages for their favorite distrib. Â Furthermore the binary is named squeak, not pharo-vm or whatever.... not really cool. Lot of garbage in the archive. Exupery vm for windows is cleaner (but contains one file called Squeak.exe ;) ). Why on Mac it's squeak 4.2.2 b1, on windows/linux squeak 3.11 ? I suppose there's an influence on unit tests / performance / .... Finally I don't know why there's an "alternative" download ... I think the alternative stuff should be on the wiki, not on the basic download page. Cheers, LaurentÂ 2010/1/19 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> I don't know. The ideal will be to ask Squeak people for a Squeak-3.11.3.2135 with FTPlugin compiled. In the meanwhile, I will then put exupery are original and that one as alternative. What do you think ? 2010/1/19 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> How do you compile FTPlugin in squeak 3.11 Â ? LaurentÂ 2010/1/19 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> Ok...so: pharo exupery vm as FTPlugin compiled and 3.11. doesn't. And both are closure-enable. Does someone have a compiled squeak-unix-vmÂ with FTPlugin ? because otherwise, I think I would rather to put again Exupery as the default one. Opinions? 2010/1/19 George Herolyants <george.herolyants(a)gmail.com> So, here are the results (see attachments). On the background of each pharo screenshot you can see the version number of the vm, and command line I used to run pharo image with this vm. As you can see results are far better for the pharo-exupery-linux-vm (which means 0.15.2f), because it has FTPlugin compiled, and squeak-unix-vm (which means 3.11.3-2135) hasn't. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Jan. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] After OB, compare to current version uses old diff

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Gary: I compared that method before and after loading OB and it is the same. The method is from gvc 2/9/2009 12:45 like this: compareToOtherVersion "Prompt the user for a reference version, then spawn a window showing the diffs between the older and the newer of the current version and the reference version as text." | change1 change2 s1 s2 | change1 := changeList at: listIndex ifAbsent: [^self]. change2 := UIManager default chooseFrom: (list copyWithoutIndex: listIndex) values: (changeList copyWithoutIndex: listIndex). change2 ifNil: [^self]. s1 := change1 string. s2 := change2 string. s1 = s2 ifTrue: [^self inform: 'Exact Match' translated]. (DiffMorph from: s1 to: s2 contextClass: change1 methodClass) openInWindowLabeled: (('Comparison from {1} to {2}' translated) format: {change1 stamp. change2 stamp}) On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:29 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > wrote: > do you have the correct version? > The problem is certainly link with override and moving package around (this > is bogus with MC). > > Stef > > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:00 PM, Gary Chambers wrote: > > > Clearly the cruicial method is overwritten... > VersionsBrowser>>compareToOtherVersion. > > > > Regards, Gary > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Mariano Martinez Peck > > To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:57 PM > > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] After OB,compare to current version uses old > diff > > > > > > > > 2010/1/19 Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2(a)btinternet.com> > > Unless code has changed then the setting for "Use Polymorph difference > tools" should do. > > I expect some code regression may have happened though. > > > > Thanks Gary. The preference is the one Henrik said, useNewDiffToolsForMC, > but it is not working for me. You can try it like this: take the latest > PharoCore 1.0 image, (10506). You will notice that it is working with the > new diff. Then, evaluate: > > > > Gofer new > > squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; > > package: 'ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser'; > > load. > > > > > > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project version: '1.0') > load. > > > > Or download OB by hand from Lukas repo. > > > > After this, you will notice it uses the old diff even if the preference > is enable and even disabling it and enabling again. > > > > Cheers > > > > Mariano > > > > > > Regards, Gary > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Mariano Martinez Peck > > To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 4:35 PM > > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] After OB,compare to current version uses old > diff > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Henrik Johansen < > henrik.s.johansen(a)veloxit.no> wrote: > > Preferences >> useNewDiffToolsForMC? > > > > I tried this before sending the email, but not. I didn't work :( > > > > > > There was some discussion some time back, I believe Lukas stated he liked > the old tools better. > > > > Ok..didn't know. > > > > Can't say I blame him, I'm never quite sure if I'm installing new one or > keeping old when merging from MC until after the fact when I use the > Polymorph tools ... > > > > > > I can blame him at all. He is helping us a lot maintaining OB a lot. If > we use his OB repository, then we should adapt to him. I don't pretend he > change his default values or preferences. I just want to know how to set up > again the new diff :) > > > > Cheers > > > > Mariano > > > > Cheers, > > Henry > > > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 5:05 26PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > > > Hi: If you take a PharoCore image, and browse the editions of a class, > then select an older one, and then select "compare to current", you see the > differences using the "new" diff, the same that we use in MC. > > > > > > However, after installing OB in a core image, it uses the "old" > version. I am not sure that change is due to OB, but at least it seems. I > checked in Preferences but I didn't find anything. > > > > > > Any hint how to put new diff again after installing OB ? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Mariano > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Pharo-project mailing list > > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Polymorph final

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

only 1.1 :) Stef On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Stef: this is only 1.1 or 1.0 also ? > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > As said, ignore those... just not in core. > > Feel free to join IRC for these questions ;-) > > Regards, Gary > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "StÃ©phane Ducasse" <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > To: <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr> > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:54 PM > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Polymorph final > > > I get > > This package depends on the following classes: > PackagePaneBrowser > SMSqueakMap > PreferencesPanel > UUniverseBrowser > > when trying to merge the PolymorphTaskBarIcons > > I'm releasing now the rest > Stef > > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 6:35 PM, Gary Chambers wrote: > > > Might be worth merging the TaskbarIcons too. Ignore any warnings > > (UniverseBrowser etc.). Should just load the valid bits. Just a nicety, > > taskbar icons/window icons (for supporting themes) etc. > > > > Regards, Gary > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "StÃ©phane Ducasse" <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > > To: <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:31 PM > > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Polymorph final > > > > > >> Ok I will do an integration pass later today :) > >> > >> Stef > >> > >> On Jan 19, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Gary Chambers wrote: > >> > >>> Nearly the last version on SqueakSource. Polymorph-Widgets-gvc.101.mcz. > >>> I seem to have lost some fixes for multiFormFillStyle (oddity with > >>> pressed control buttons...). > >>> > >>> Let me know if there are any merge problems. > >>> > >>> Adds OverflowRowMorph to browser switches/button-bar. > >>> > >>> Regards, Gary > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Pharo-project mailing list > >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pharo-project mailing list > >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Jan. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Polymorph final

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

I did > Feel free to join IRC for these questions ;-) I was STef > > Regards, Gary > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "StÃ©phane Ducasse" <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > To: <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr> > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:54 PM > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Polymorph final > > > I get > > This package depends on the following classes: > PackagePaneBrowser > SMSqueakMap > PreferencesPanel > UUniverseBrowser > > when trying to merge the PolymorphTaskBarIcons > > I'm releasing now the rest > Stef > > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 6:35 PM, Gary Chambers wrote: > >> Might be worth merging the TaskbarIcons too. Ignore any warnings >> (UniverseBrowser etc.). Should just load the valid bits. Just a nicety, >> taskbar icons/window icons (for supporting themes) etc. >> >> Regards, Gary >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "StÃ©phane Ducasse" <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> >> To: <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:31 PM >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Polymorph final >> >> >>> Ok I will do an integration pass later today :) >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Gary Chambers wrote: >>> >>>> Nearly the last version on SqueakSource. Polymorph-Widgets-gvc.101.mcz. >>>> I seem to have lost some fixes for multiFormFillStyle (oddity with >>>> pressed control buttons...). >>>> >>>> Let me know if there are any merge problems. >>>> >>>> Adds OverflowRowMorph to browser switches/button-bar. >>>> >>>> Regards, Gary >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Jan. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] After OB, compare to current version uses old diff

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

do you have the correct version? The problem is certainly link with override and moving package around (this is bogus with MC). Stef On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:00 PM, Gary Chambers wrote: > Clearly the cruicial method is overwritten... VersionsBrowser>>compareToOtherVersion. > > Regards, Gary > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mariano Martinez Peck > To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:57 PM > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] After OB,compare to current version uses old diff > > > > 2010/1/19 Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2(a)btinternet.com> > Unless code has changed then the setting for "Use Polymorph difference tools" should do. > I expect some code regression may have happened though. > > Thanks Gary. The preference is the one Henrik said, useNewDiffToolsForMC, but it is not working for me. You can try it like this: take the latest PharoCore 1.0 image, (10506). You will notice that it is working with the new diff. Then, evaluate: > > Gofer new > squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; > package: 'ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser'; > load. > > > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project version: '1.0') load. > > Or download OB by hand from Lukas repo. > > After this, you will notice it uses the old diff even if the preference is enable and even disabling it and enabling again. > > Cheers > > Mariano > > > Regards, Gary > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mariano Martinez Peck > To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 4:35 PM > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] After OB,compare to current version uses old diff > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johansen(a)veloxit.no> wrote: > Preferences >> useNewDiffToolsForMC? > > I tried this before sending the email, but not. I didn't work :( > > > There was some discussion some time back, I believe Lukas stated he liked the old tools better. > > Ok..didn't know. > > Can't say I blame him, I'm never quite sure if I'm installing new one or keeping old when merging from MC until after the fact when I use the Polymorph tools ... > > > I can blame him at all. He is helping us a lot maintaining OB a lot. If we use his OB repository, then we should adapt to him. I don't pretend he change his default values or preferences. I just want to know how to set up again the new diff :) > > Cheers > > Mariano > > Cheers, > Henry > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 5:05 26PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > Hi: If you take a PharoCore image, and browse the editions of a class, then select an older one, and then select "compare to current", you see the differences using the "new" diff, the same that we use in MC. > > > > However, after installing OB in a core image, it uses the "old" version. I am not sure that change is due to OB, but at least it seems. I checked in Preferences but I didn't find anything. > > > > Any hint how to put new diff again after installing OB ? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Mariano > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Jan. 19, 2010