June 2008 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Who is working on which tests? Why are there new, broken tests?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

aha. may be squeakdev is based on another image or there is package that when loading remove hex. Stef On Jun 10, 2008, at 9:35 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > > Wow. > > I took pharo0.1-10032-7075dev08.06.1 and updated it. There is no > Integer>>hex there. > > Damien, can you help? It looks like the pharo-dev image is somehow > out of sync. > > I will try both again now. > > - on > > On Jun 10, 2008, at 9:21 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi oscar >> >> I took the pharo image Pharo0.1-10028-2008-05-24 available on the >> pharo web site >> and did an update. >> >> and there is >> Integer>>hex >> ^ self printStringBase: 16 >> >> I checked the version and it is from 25 of may >> >> Stef >> >>> >>> Hi Stef, >>> >>> I loaded a fresh pharo-dev image and updated everything. Then the >>> testHex tests failed, so I fixed them. >>> >>> Can you please tell me which implementors of hex you find in your >>> image? >>> >>> I only find Character>>hex and Float>>hex. I had to implement >>> Integer>>hex myself. >>> >>> - on >>> >>> On Jun 10, 2008, at 6:38 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> testHex >>>> self assert: $a hex '61' = '61'. >>>> self assert: Character space hex = '20' >>>> >>>> is green on my image >>>> >>>> as well as this one >>>> >>>> testHex >>>> self assert: 0 hex = '0'. >>>> self assert: 12 hex = 'C'. >>>> self assert: 1234 hex = '4D2'. >>>> >>>> They are red in yours? >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 10, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, I thought we would start to fix the existing broken tests >>>>> before adding new broken tests. >>>>> >>>>> I would also be very happy to see some comments when someone >>>>> adds a new broken test, so I know what the plan is. >>>>> >>>>> Now I added an implementation of Integer>>hex, for example, but >>>>> I am not so sure why we need this. >>>>> Ain't too many senders. An easier fix would have been to remove >>>>> the broken test. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> - on >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 10, 2008, at 15:53, Bill Schwab wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Is your concern that the new tests are broken (which seems >>>>>> normal to me >>>>>> that they would start out that way), or are you objecting to >>>>>> their being >>>>>> included in the image? >>>>>> >>>>>> I can see arguments either way on the latter. If code in the >>>>>> image is >>>>>> wrong and a clearly correct but currently failing test >>>>>> highlights it, >>>>>> I'd rather be alerted to it. You are also correct that having >>>>>> them >>>>>> included draws attention that could easily encourage >>>>>> duplication of >>>>>> effort. >>>>>> >>>>>> Comments? >>>>>> >>>>>> Bill >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. >>>>>> University of Florida >>>>>> Department of Anesthesiology >>>>>> PO Box 100254 >>>>>> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 >>>>>> >>>>>> Email: bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu >>>>>> Tel: (352) 846-1285 >>>>>> FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> oscar(a)iam.unibe.ch 06/10/08 8:31 AM >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I looked at the wiki page >>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CurrentlyWorkingOn >>>>>> but it does not say much. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to work through some tests, but I cannot find an >>>>>> overview. >>>>>> >>>>>> The tests CharacterTest>>testHex and IntegerTest>>testHex are >>>>>> broken >>>>>> but seem to be very new. Stef, are you working on these? You >>>>>> seem to >>>>>> have written the tests ... >>>>>> >>>>>> - on >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] self halt in RxParserTest>>testMatchesInwW

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Ok I will publish a new version of the package on squeaksource stef On Jun 10, 2008, at 9:04 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > > You har the image-meister, so you should patch it, I think. I can > only add a patch into the PharoInbox, but this is so trivial it is > easier if you just update your master image. > > - on > > On Jun 10, 2008, at 6:33 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> Yes go ahead. >> >> Stef >> >> On Jun 10, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: >> >>> >>> Stef, >>> >>> RxParserTest>>testMatchesInwW >>> >>> has a self halt in it dating from 2006, apparently added by you. >>> >>> I guess you should remove it ... The test runs fine otherwise. >>> >>> - on >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] KernelTests green

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Excellent! may be this is the hash of class that changed. Marcus retrochanged the hash behavior that we harvested in 3.9. And may be in 3.10 they changed class hash too. Now I do not know if in 3.9 these tests were broken. Stef On Jun 10, 2008, at 9:32 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > > OK, I investigated more deeply. > > It appears that SequenceableCollection>>hash behaves differently in > Pharo and Squeak 3.10. > > Squeak: > > #(1) hash --> 22516953 > > Pharo: > > #(1) hash --> 61541560 > > Since DateAndTime>>hash is ultimately implemented in terms of > Array>>hash (inherited from SequenceableCollection), this test fails. > > Not yet sure why these two behave differently ... > > Already the first line (self species hash) is different: > > Squeak: > > Array hash --> 259007228 > > Pharo: > > Array hash --> 2455 > > - on > > On Jun 10, 2008, at 6:34 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> We checked with lukas what is strange is that the same tests are >> green in 3.10. >> >> Stef >> >> On Jun 10, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: >> >>> >>> I have posted some patches to the inbox to make the Kernel Number >>> tests run, and in the Issues page I propose to delete a bunch of >>> nonsensical testHash tests. With these changes the Kernel tests >>> should all be green. >>> >>> - on >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Who is working on which tests? Why are there new, broken tests?

by Oscar Nierstrasz

Wow. I took pharo0.1-10032-7075dev08.06.1 and updated it. There is no Integer>>hex there. Damien, can you help? It looks like the pharo-dev image is somehow out of sync. I will try both again now. - on On Jun 10, 2008, at 9:21 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Hi oscar > > I took the pharo image Pharo0.1-10028-2008-05-24 available on the > pharo web site > and did an update. > > and there is > Integer>>hex > ^ self printStringBase: 16 > > I checked the version and it is from 25 of may > > Stef > >> >> Hi Stef, >> >> I loaded a fresh pharo-dev image and updated everything. Then the >> testHex tests failed, so I fixed them. >> >> Can you please tell me which implementors of hex you find in your >> image? >> >> I only find Character>>hex and Float>>hex. I had to implement >> Integer>>hex myself. >> >> - on >> >> On Jun 10, 2008, at 6:38 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> testHex >>> self assert: $a hex '61' = '61'. >>> self assert: Character space hex = '20' >>> >>> is green on my image >>> >>> as well as this one >>> >>> testHex >>> self assert: 0 hex = '0'. >>> self assert: 12 hex = 'C'. >>> self assert: 1234 hex = '4D2'. >>> >>> They are red in yours? >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> >>> On Jun 10, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Well, I thought we would start to fix the existing broken tests >>>> before adding new broken tests. >>>> >>>> I would also be very happy to see some comments when someone adds >>>> a new broken test, so I know what the plan is. >>>> >>>> Now I added an implementation of Integer>>hex, for example, but I >>>> am not so sure why we need this. >>>> Ain't too many senders. An easier fix would have been to remove >>>> the broken test. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> - on >>>> >>>> On Jun 10, 2008, at 15:53, Bill Schwab wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is your concern that the new tests are broken (which seems >>>>> normal to me >>>>> that they would start out that way), or are you objecting to >>>>> their being >>>>> included in the image? >>>>> >>>>> I can see arguments either way on the latter. If code in the >>>>> image is >>>>> wrong and a clearly correct but currently failing test >>>>> highlights it, >>>>> I'd rather be alerted to it. You are also correct that having >>>>> them >>>>> included draws attention that could easily encourage duplication >>>>> of >>>>> effort. >>>>> >>>>> Comments? >>>>> >>>>> Bill >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. >>>>> University of Florida >>>>> Department of Anesthesiology >>>>> PO Box 100254 >>>>> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 >>>>> >>>>> Email: bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu >>>>> Tel: (352) 846-1285 >>>>> FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>>>> >>>>>>>> oscar(a)iam.unibe.ch 06/10/08 8:31 AM >>> >>>>> >>>>> I looked at the wiki page >>>>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CurrentlyWorkingOn >>>>> but it does not say much. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to work through some tests, but I cannot find an >>>>> overview. >>>>> >>>>> The tests CharacterTest>>testHex and IntegerTest>>testHex are >>>>> broken >>>>> but seem to be very new. Stef, are you working on these? You >>>>> seem to >>>>> have written the tests ... >>>>> >>>>> - on >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] KernelTests green

by Oscar Nierstrasz

OK, I investigated more deeply. It appears that SequenceableCollection>>hash behaves differently in Pharo and Squeak 3.10. Squeak: #(1) hash --> 22516953 Pharo: #(1) hash --> 61541560 Since DateAndTime>>hash is ultimately implemented in terms of Array>>hash (inherited from SequenceableCollection), this test fails. Not yet sure why these two behave differently ... Already the first line (self species hash) is different: Squeak: Array hash --> 259007228 Pharo: Array hash --> 2455 - on On Jun 10, 2008, at 6:34 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > We checked with lukas what is strange is that the same tests are > green in 3.10. > > Stef > > On Jun 10, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > >> >> I have posted some patches to the inbox to make the Kernel Number >> tests run, and in the Issues page I propose to delete a bunch of >> nonsensical testHash tests. With these changes the Kernel tests >> should all be green. >> >> - on >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] test fixes + MVC cleaning step one

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

I missed some packages since my script only dealt with dirty packages. So I will continue to harvest the rest of the changes. Stef On Jun 10, 2008, at 9:13 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Hi guys > > I harvested the MVC step one changes of Alain Plantec > Next the on: of damien. > > PS: I'm checking the hex problem by rebuilding my image from the > latest image available. > > Stef > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Who is working on which tests? Why are there new, broken tests?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi oscar I took the pharo image Pharo0.1-10028-2008-05-24 available on the pharo web site and did an update. and there is Integer>>hex ^ self printStringBase: 16 I checked the version and it is from 25 of may Stef > > Hi Stef, > > I loaded a fresh pharo-dev image and updated everything. Then the > testHex tests failed, so I fixed them. > > Can you please tell me which implementors of hex you find in your > image? > > I only find Character>>hex and Float>>hex. I had to implement > Integer>>hex myself. > > - on > > On Jun 10, 2008, at 6:38 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> testHex >> self assert: $a hex '61' = '61'. >> self assert: Character space hex = '20' >> >> is green on my image >> >> as well as this one >> >> testHex >> self assert: 0 hex = '0'. >> self assert: 12 hex = 'C'. >> self assert: 1234 hex = '4D2'. >> >> They are red in yours? >> >> Stef >> >> >> On Jun 10, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: >> >>> >>> Well, I thought we would start to fix the existing broken tests >>> before adding new broken tests. >>> >>> I would also be very happy to see some comments when someone adds >>> a new broken test, so I know what the plan is. >>> >>> Now I added an implementation of Integer>>hex, for example, but I >>> am not so sure why we need this. >>> Ain't too many senders. An easier fix would have been to remove >>> the broken test. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> - on >>> >>> On Jun 10, 2008, at 15:53, Bill Schwab wrote: >>> >>>> Is your concern that the new tests are broken (which seems normal >>>> to me >>>> that they would start out that way), or are you objecting to >>>> their being >>>> included in the image? >>>> >>>> I can see arguments either way on the latter. If code in the >>>> image is >>>> wrong and a clearly correct but currently failing test highlights >>>> it, >>>> I'd rather be alerted to it. You are also correct that having them >>>> included draws attention that could easily encourage duplication of >>>> effort. >>>> >>>> Comments? >>>> >>>> Bill >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. >>>> University of Florida >>>> Department of Anesthesiology >>>> PO Box 100254 >>>> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 >>>> >>>> Email: bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu >>>> Tel: (352) 846-1285 >>>> FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>>> >>>>>>> oscar(a)iam.unibe.ch 06/10/08 8:31 AM >>> >>>> >>>> I looked at the wiki page >>>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CurrentlyWorkingOn >>>> but it does not say much. >>>> >>>> I would like to work through some tests, but I cannot find an >>>> overview. >>>> >>>> The tests CharacterTest>>testHex and IntegerTest>>testHex are >>>> broken >>>> but seem to be very new. Stef, are you working on these? You >>>> seem to >>>> have written the tests ... >>>> >>>> - on >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 10, 2008

[Pharo-project] [ANN] test fixes + MVC cleaning step one

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi guys I harvested the MVC step one changes of Alain Plantec Next the on: of damien. PS: I'm checking the hex problem by rebuilding my image from the latest image available. Stef

June 10, 2008

[Pharo-project] Integer>>hex

by Oscar Nierstrasz

I just checked the 3.10 image. There is no IntegerTest>>testHex, but there is an Integer>>hex which behaves differently from what you specified. I really don't understand what this is all about. I suggest to drop IntegerTest>>testHex for now. - on On Jun 10, 2008, at 9:03 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > > Hi Stef, > > I loaded a fresh pharo-dev image and updated everything. Then the > testHex tests failed, so I fixed them. > > Can you please tell me which implementors of hex you find in your > image? > > I only find Character>>hex and Float>>hex. I had to implement > Integer>>hex myself. > > - on > > On Jun 10, 2008, at 6:38 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> testHex >> self assert: $a hex '61' = '61'. >> self assert: Character space hex = '20' >> >> is green on my image >> >> as well as this one >> >> testHex >> self assert: 0 hex = '0'. >> self assert: 12 hex = 'C'. >> self assert: 1234 hex = '4D2'. >> >> They are red in yours? >> >> Stef >> >> >> On Jun 10, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: >> >>> >>> Well, I thought we would start to fix the existing broken tests >>> before adding new broken tests. >>> >>> I would also be very happy to see some comments when someone adds >>> a new broken test, so I know what the plan is. >>> >>> Now I added an implementation of Integer>>hex, for example, but I >>> am not so sure why we need this. >>> Ain't too many senders. An easier fix would have been to remove >>> the broken test. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> - on >>> >>> On Jun 10, 2008, at 15:53, Bill Schwab wrote: >>> >>>> Is your concern that the new tests are broken (which seems normal >>>> to me >>>> that they would start out that way), or are you objecting to >>>> their being >>>> included in the image? >>>> >>>> I can see arguments either way on the latter. If code in the >>>> image is >>>> wrong and a clearly correct but currently failing test highlights >>>> it, >>>> I'd rather be alerted to it. You are also correct that having them >>>> included draws attention that could easily encourage duplication of >>>> effort. >>>> >>>> Comments? >>>> >>>> Bill >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. >>>> University of Florida >>>> Department of Anesthesiology >>>> PO Box 100254 >>>> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 >>>> >>>> Email: bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu >>>> Tel: (352) 846-1285 >>>> FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>>> >>>>>>> oscar(a)iam.unibe.ch 06/10/08 8:31 AM >>> >>>> >>>> I looked at the wiki page >>>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CurrentlyWorkingOn >>>> but it does not say much. >>>> >>>> I would like to work through some tests, but I cannot find an >>>> overview. >>>> >>>> The tests CharacterTest>>testHex and IntegerTest>>testHex are >>>> broken >>>> but seem to be very new. Stef, are you working on these? You >>>> seem to >>>> have written the tests ... >>>> >>>> - on >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] self halt in RxParserTest>>testMatchesInwW

by Oscar Nierstrasz

You har the image-meister, so you should patch it, I think. I can only add a patch into the PharoInbox, but this is so trivial it is easier if you just update your master image. - on On Jun 10, 2008, at 6:33 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Yes go ahead. > > Stef > > On Jun 10, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > >> >> Stef, >> >> RxParserTest>>testMatchesInwW >> >> has a self halt in it dating from 2006, apparently added by you. >> >> I guess you should remove it ... The test runs fine otherwise. >> >> - on >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 10, 2008