We have a couple of stale branches, named a bit chaotically, Iâd like to rename them in a good way, but I donât remember what they are about :) The numbers below (behind | ahead) are according to the current stable pharo9 branch. - headless has already the new tree organisation with cmake - dev-7 and pharo branches have the old tree organisation, dev-7 has some bugfixes when comparing to `pharo` - Cog has the original imported version from monticello Maybe we can have some naming convention for branches? - pharo-[version] to denote major development version branches - feat/[feature] for feature branches if needed Then the four above should be renamed accordingly. Something on the lines of... - Cog -> rename as pharo-0? - pharo -> can be removed - dev-7 -> pharo-1 - headless -> pharo-2 ? G