Hi, I wanted to try new brick/bloc thing https://pharoweekly.wordpress.com/2015/05/30/future-new-widget-sets-is-comin... however after loading (in Pharo 5.0) it is complaining about missing FILOStack (in BlBrickLayouter>>initialize) What should I load? Thanks, Peter
I think this should do it: Gofer it smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'Bloc'; configurationOf: 'Bloc'; loadDevelopment. Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'Brick'; package: 'Brick-Core'; package: 'Brick-Scrollpane'; package: 'Brick-List'; load. ConfigurationOfTxText loadDevelopment. Cheers, Doru On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to try new brick/bloc thing https://pharoweekly.wordpress.com/2015/05/30/future-new-widget-sets-is-comin...
however after loading (in Pharo 5.0) it is complaining about missing FILOStack (in BlBrickLayouter>>initialize)
What should I load?
Thanks, Peter
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
Doru can you give me access to the repo of brick because I'm writing a configuration and a CI? Stef Le 1/6/15 07:28, Tudor Girba a écrit :
I think this should do it:
Gofer it smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'Bloc'; configurationOf: 'Bloc'; loadDevelopment. Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'Brick'; package: 'Brick-Core'; package: 'Brick-Scrollpane'; package: 'Brick-List'; load. ConfigurationOfTxText loadDevelopment.
Cheers, Doru
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com <mailto:i.uhnak@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to try new brick/bloc thing https://pharoweekly.wordpress.com/2015/05/30/future-new-widget-sets-is-comin...
however after loading (in Pharo 5.0) it is complaining about missing FILOStack (in BlBrickLayouter>>initialize)
What should I load?
Thanks, Peter
-- www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
"Every thing has its own flow"
Both Brick and Bloc are in the Pharo repository. I think you have some rights there :) MCHttpRepository location: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Brick/main' user: '' password: '' Doru On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:08 AM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
Doru
can you give me access to the repo of brick because I'm writing a configuration and a CI?
Stef
Le 1/6/15 07:28, Tudor Girba a écrit :
I think this should do it:
Gofer it smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'Bloc'; configurationOf: 'Bloc'; loadDevelopment. Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'Brick'; package: 'Brick-Core'; package: 'Brick-Scrollpane'; package: 'Brick-List'; load. ConfigurationOfTxText loadDevelopment.
Cheers, Doru
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to try new brick/bloc thing https://pharoweekly.wordpress.com/2015/05/30/future-new-widget-sets-is-comin...
however after loading (in Pharo 5.0) it is complaining about missing FILOStack (in BlBrickLayouter>>initialize)
What should I load?
Thanks, Peter
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
Hi, Oops, this kind of stack is from moose and not in pharo :) Yes, better to use a queue - thanks! Cheers, Alex On Jun 1, 2015 7:32 AM, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 31 May 2015, at 23:15, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
FILOStack
Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ?
Should work now, just update using Doru's script :) Cheers, Alex On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Oops, this kind of stack is from moose and not in pharo :)
Yes, better to use a queue - thanks!
Cheers, Alex On Jun 1, 2015 7:32 AM, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 31 May 2015, at 23:15, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
FILOStack
Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ?
Thanks, it seems to work now. I also had to switch to newly created "bloc" space. Why is that required? Why it wouldn't work also from "regular" Pharo space?
FILOStack
Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ?
queue is FIFO (first in, first out) FILO technically should be the same as LIFO, only I have never heard someone say it in that order (since the top of the stack is the important bit, not the bottom). Peter On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel@gmail.com> wrote:
Should work now, just update using Doru's script :)
Cheers, Alex
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Oops, this kind of stack is from moose and not in pharo :)
Yes, better to use a queue - thanks!
Cheers, Alex On Jun 1, 2015 7:32 AM, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 31 May 2015, at 23:15, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
FILOStack
Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ?
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, it seems to work now. I also had to switch to newly created "bloc" space. Why is that required? Why it wouldn't work also from "regular" Pharo space?
Because it's Bloc, a complete replacement for morphic - with its own spaces/managers/event fetcher and everything else. Also, it's complete vector based :) Alain Plantec will present it at ESUG, I suppose. Cheers, Alex
Bloc is a ***real*** Morph new kernel. Now we are lucky because it is powerful enough so that we can render morphic morph inside itself. But Bloc has a new architecture rendering, event loop, and many more. Stef Le 1/6/15 08:09, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
Thanks, it seems to work now. I also had to switch to newly created "bloc" space. Why is that required? Why it wouldn't work also from "regular" Pharo space?
FILOStack
Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ?
queue is FIFO (first in, first out) FILO technically should be the same as LIFO, only I have never heard someone say it in that order (since the top of the stack is the important bit, not the bottom).
Peter
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel@gmail.com <mailto:alex.syrel@gmail.com>> wrote:
Should work now, just update using Doru's script :)
Cheers, Alex
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel@gmail.com <mailto:alex.syrel@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Oops, this kind of stack is from moose and not in pharo :)
Yes, better to use a queue - thanks!
Cheers, Alex
On Jun 1, 2015 7:32 AM, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <sven@stfx.eu <mailto:sven@stfx.eu>> wrote:
> On 31 May 2015, at 23:15, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com <mailto:i.uhnak@gmail.com>> wrote: > > FILOStack
Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ?
On 01 Jun 2015, at 08:09, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, it seems to work now. I also had to switch to newly created "bloc" space. Why is that required? Why it wouldn't work also from "regular" Pharo space?
FILOStack
Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ?
queue is FIFO (first in, first out)
Right ;-)
FILO technically should be the same as LIFO, only I have never heard someone say it in that order (since the top of the stack is the important bit, not the bottom).
Well, it was confusing ...
Peter
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel@gmail.com> wrote: Should work now, just update using Doru's script :)
Cheers, Alex
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel@gmail.com> wrote: Hi,
Oops, this kind of stack is from moose and not in pharo :)
Yes, better to use a queue - thanks!
Cheers, Alex
On Jun 1, 2015 7:32 AM, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 31 May 2015, at 23:15, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
FILOStack
Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ?
Maybe a FILOStack has lots of very thin layers? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filo) Best wishes Peter Kenny -----Original Message----- From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of Sven Van Caekenberghe Sent: 01 June 2015 08:13 To: Any question about pharo is welcome Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] brick/bloc examples missing FILOStack
On 01 Jun 2015, at 08:09, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, it seems to work now. I also had to switch to newly created "bloc" space. Why is that required? Why it wouldn't work also from "regular" Pharo space?
FILOStack
Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ?
queue is FIFO (first in, first out)
Right ;-)
FILO technically should be the same as LIFO, only I have never heard someone say it in that order (since the top of the stack is the important bit, not the bottom).
Well, it was confusing ...
Peter
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel@gmail.com> wrote: Should work now, just update using Doru's script :)
Cheers, Alex
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel@gmail.com> wrote: Hi,
Oops, this kind of stack is from moose and not in pharo :)
Yes, better to use a queue - thanks!
Cheers, Alex
On Jun 1, 2015 7:32 AM, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 31 May 2015, at 23:15, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
FILOStack
Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ?
participants (6)
-
Aliaksei Syrel -
PBKResearch -
Peter Uhnák -
stepharo -
Sven Van Caekenberghe -
Tudor Girba