Hi Sven. If people already know these things, there is no need to push the client. *Asking* if *we* know these things does not involve any push of the client. Being happy does not preclude being informed. On 2 December 2015 at 12:29, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 02 Dec 2015, at 10:58, EuanM <euanmee@gmail.com> wrote:
It would be really interesting, and really useful to community-enlargement works, to know: Which part of Thales drove this? What is their specific interest in Pharo? Or what is their current (or proposed) use of Pharo?
Is there anyone who knows the answers to these questions?
Are Thales or the Consortium wanting to keep this information private?
In the first place, let's just be very happy for each and every (new) consortium member, their money is much needed to set up a stable, sustainable infrastructure for Pharo.
Then it is up to each member to decide how to they want to proceed. Some write a use case or success story, when they are ready, some don't. Let's not push them, even if it would indeed be interesting to know the answer to your questions.
On 30 November 2015 at 04:27, EuanM <euanmee@gmail.com> wrote:
That's great news.
It would be really interesting, and really useful to community-enlargement works, to know: Which part of Thales drove this? What is their specific interest in Pharo? Or what is their current (or proposed) use of Pharo?
On 26 November 2015 at 13:42, <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
The Pharo Consortium is very happy to announce that Thales has joined the Consortium as an Gold Member.
About - Thales: https://www.thalesgroup.com - Pharo Consortium: http://consortium.pharo.org
The goal of the Pharo Consortium is to allow companies and institutions to support the ongoing development and future of Pharo.
Individuals can support Pharo via the Pharo Association: